...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electrocardiology: An International Publication for the Study of the Electrical Activities of the Heart >Assessment of QT-measurement accuracy using the 12-lead electrocardiogram derived from EASI leads.
【24h】

Assessment of QT-measurement accuracy using the 12-lead electrocardiogram derived from EASI leads.

机译:使用源自EASI引线的12引线心电图评估QT测量准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of the present study is to assess QT-interval measurements from the EASI 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) as compared with the standard 12-lead ECG. The QT interval was automatically determined in simultaneously recorded standard and EASI 12-lead ECGs, using a validated wavelet-based delineator. The agreement between the 2 sets of measurements was quantified both on a lead-by-lead basis and a multilead basis with global definitions of QRS onset and T-wave end. The results show that the agreement between QT-interval measurements from the 2 lead systems is acceptable, with negligible mean differences and with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 depending on the lead studied. Although the SD shows a clear dependence on the selected lead (ranging from 9.2 to 26.4 milliseconds), differences are within the accepted tolerances for automatic delineation. In a few patients, large differences were found, mainly because of changes in morphology present in both lead systems. QT intervals measured by the multilead approach were considerably more stable than single-lead measurements and resulted in a much better agreement between the 2 lead systems (correlation coefficient, 0.98; QT difference, 1.1 +/- 9.8 milliseconds). Thus, the EASI 12-lead ECG may be used for reliable QT monitoring when the multilead delineation approach is adopted.
机译:本研究的目的是评估EASI 12导联心电图(ECG)与标准12导联心电图相比的QT间隔测量值。使用经过验证的基于小波的轮廓线,在同时记录的标准和EASI 12导联心电图中自动确定QT间隔。这两组测量之间的一致性在逐个导联和多导联的基础上进行了量化,并定义了QRS发作和T波末端的整体定义。结果表明,两种铅系统的QT间隔测量之间的一致性是可以接受的,平均差异可以忽略不计,并且相关系数取决于研究的铅,范围为0.91至0.98。尽管SD显示出对选定导线的明显依赖性(范围从9.2到26.4毫秒),但差异在自动描绘的可接受公差范围内。在少数患者中,发现差异很大,这主要是由于两个导联系统均存在形态变化。用多引线方法测量的QT间隔比单引线测量的稳定得多,并且导致两个引线系统之间的一致性更好(相关系数为0.98; QT差为1.1 +/- 9.8毫秒)。因此,当采用多引线描绘方法时,EASI 12导联心电图可用于可靠的QT监测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号