首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
【24h】

Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.

机译:聚合收缩:树脂复合修复体的边界条件和填充技术的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the linear polymerization shrinkage (LPS) and the effect of polymerization shrinkage of a resin composite and resin-dentin bond strength under different boundary conditions and filling techniques. METHODS: Two cavities (4 x 4 x 2 mm3) were prepared in bovine incisors (n=30). The teeth were divided into three groups, according to boundary conditions: In group TE, the total-etch technique was used. In group EE, only enamel was conditioned, and in group NE, none of the walls of the cavities were conditioned. A two-step adhesive system was applied to all cavities. The resin composite was inserted in one (B) or three increments (I) and light-cured with 600 mW/cm2 (80 s). The LPS (%) was measured in the top-bottom direction, by placing a probe in contact with resin composite during curing. Enamel and total mean gap widths were measured (400 x) in three slices obtained after sectioning the restorations. Then, the slices were sectioned again, either to obtain sticks from the adhesive interface from the bottom of the cavity or to obtain resin composite sticks (0.8 mm2) to be tested for tensile strength (Kratos machine, 0.5 mm/min). The data was subjected to a two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test for comparison of the means (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: The highest percentage of LPS was found for the TE when bulk filled, and the lowest percentage of LPS was found in the EE and NE when incrementally filled. The resin-dentin bond strength was higher and the total mean gap width was lower for TE group; no significant effect was detected for the main factor filling techniques. No difference was detected for the tensile strength of resin composite among the experimental groups. CONCLUSIONS: The filling technique is not able to minimize effects of the polymerization shrinkage, and bonding to the cavity walls is necessary to assure reduced mean gap width and high bond strength values.
机译:目的:评估线性边界收缩率(LPS)以及在不同边界条件和填充技术条件下树脂复合材料的聚合收缩率和树脂-牙本质粘合强度的影响。方法:在牛切牙(n = 30)中准备两个腔(4 x 4 x 2 mm3)。根据边界条件将牙齿分为三组:在TE组中,使用了全蚀刻技术。在EE组中,仅对搪瓷进行过调理,在NE组中,没有对空腔壁进行过调理。将两步式粘合剂系统应用于所有型腔。将树脂复合材料以一个(B)或三个增量(I)插入,并以600 mW / cm2(80 s)进行光固化。通过在固化期间将探针与树脂复合物接触,在上下方向上测量LPS(%)。在切开修复体后获得的三个切片中测量了牙釉质和总平均间隙宽度(400 x)。然后,将切片再次切成薄片,或者从空腔底部的粘合剂界面中获得棒状物,或者获得用于测试拉伸强度的树脂复合材料棒状物(0.8 mm2)(Kratos机器,0.5 mm / min)。数据经过两次重复测量方差分析和Tukey检验以比较均值(alpha = 0.05)。结果:批量填充时,TE的LPS百分比最高,而EE和NE中增量填充时的LPS百分比最低。 TE组的树脂-牙本质粘合强度较高,总平均间隙宽度较低;没有发现主要因素填充技术的显着影响。实验组之间未检测到树脂复合材料的拉伸强度差异。结论:填充技术不能使聚合收缩的影响最小化,并且必须与空腔壁粘接以确保减小的平均间隙宽度和较高的粘接强度值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号