首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
【24h】

SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.

机译:扫描电镜和微渗漏评估两种类型的V类修复体在使用或不使用可光固化涂料和抛光的情况下的边缘完整性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the marginal integrity of class V restorations through an SEM observation and a microleakage test. METHODS: Teeth with class V cavities were restored with either a flowable composite (n=20) or a glass ionomer cement (GIC) (n=20). Ten restorations in each group were immediately polished. A coating agent was applied on five polished and five non-polished restorations of each group. No coating was used on the remaining specimens. Epoxy resin replicas of the restorations were observed under a SEM and the percentage of marginal gaps was calculated. After immersion in a 2% methylene blue solution, three sections were obtained from each specimen and observed under a stereomicroscope. Occlusal and gingival microleakage were evaluated with a four-steps scoring system. The percentages of marginal gaps and the microleakage scores were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and the Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni's correction. Occlusal and gingival microleakage were compared with the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: No gaps were detected after coating. The restorative materials did not differ in interfacial gaps. Immediate polishing increased the gaps of uncoated restorations (p<0.05). The microleakage decreased with coating, except for occlusal wall of polished flowable composite restorations. After coating, the occlusal microleakage was higher than the gingival (p<0.05), except for non-polished flowable composite restorations. After polishing and coating, the flowable composite showed higher occlusal microleakage than the GIC. The polishing increased the occlusal microleakage of coated flowable composite restorations. CONCLUSIONS: The coating procedure is advisable for restoring marginal integrity and reducing gingival microleakage in class V restorations.
机译:目的:通过SEM观察和微渗漏测试评估V级修复体的边缘完整性。方法:使用可流动的复合材料(n = 20)或玻璃离子聚合物(GIC)(n = 20)修复V级蛀牙。立即对每组十个修复体进行抛光。在每组的五个抛光和五个非抛光修复体上施加涂料。其余样品未使用涂层。在SEM下观察修复体的环氧树脂复制品,并计算边缘间隙的百分比。浸入2%亚甲蓝溶液中后,从每个样品中获得三个切片,并在立体显微镜下观察。牙合和牙龈微渗漏通过四步评分系统进行评估。使用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析和经Bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney检验分析边缘间隙的百分比和微渗漏分数。将牙合和牙龈微渗漏与Wilcoxon检验进行比较。结果:涂布后未发现间隙。修复材料的界面间隙没有差异。立即抛光会增加未涂层修复体的间隙(p <0.05)。除抛光的可流动复合修复体的咬合壁外,微渗漏随涂层而降低。包被后,除未抛光的可流动复合修复体外,咬合微渗漏均高于牙龈(p <0.05)。抛光和涂覆后,可流动复合材料的咬合微渗漏率高于GIC。抛光增加了涂覆的可流动复合修复体的咬合微渗漏。结论:建议在V级修复中恢复边缘完整性并减少牙龈微渗漏,采用涂覆方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号