...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Comparison of incidence of complications and aesthetic performance for posterior metal-free polymer crowns and metal-ceramic crowns: Results from a randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of incidence of complications and aesthetic performance for posterior metal-free polymer crowns and metal-ceramic crowns: Results from a randomized clinical trial

机译:后无金属聚合物冠和金属陶瓷冠的并发症发生率和美学表现的比较:一项随机临床试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior, metal-free polymer crowns after follow-up for up to six years, and to compare it with the performance of metal-ceramic crowns. Methods Eighty single crowns, manufactured from a polymer composite resin, were set on posterior teeth. Half of these received a glass-fibre framework (group 1) whereas half were prepared without framework stabilization (group 2). As the control group, 40 conventional metal-ceramic crowns were inserted. Primary endpoints were incidence of complications, investigated on a time-to-event basis, plaque status, and aesthetic performance. Results Thirty clinically relevant complications occurred after a median time of 2.3 years. Median follow-up time was four years. The most frequent complications were delamination (n = 24) and root-canal treatment (n = 4) of the crowns; the incidence of complications was not significantly different among crown materials (p = 0.60). Twenty crowns had to be replaced (six polymer crowns in group 1, nine polymer crowns in group 2, four crowns in the control group, and one tooth (in group 1) had to be extracted). Mean plaque and gingival indexes for the test groups did not differ from those for the control group. Conclusions Within a median follow-up period of four years, the clinical performance of posterior polymer crowns with and without a glass-fibre framework was not significantly different from that of metal-ceramic crowns, although the number of catastrophic failures of composite crowns was higher than that of the metal-ceramic crowns. Clinical significance On the basis of the study results, posterior polymer crowns may be an alternative to metal-ceramic crowns, although additional research is needed before they can be recommended, without reservation, as permanent restorations.
机译:目的这项随机临床研究的目的是评估随访长达六年的无金属后路聚合物冠的临床表现,并将其与金属陶瓷冠的表现进行比较。方法将80个由聚合物复合树脂制成的单冠置于后牙上。其中一半接受了玻璃纤维框架(第1组),而一半没有框架稳定化的准备(第2组)。作为对照组,插入了40个常规金属陶瓷牙冠。主要终点是并发症发生率,按事件进行调查,斑块状态和美学表现。结果中位时间为2.3年,发生30例临床相关并发症。中位随访时间为四年。最常见的并发症是牙冠脱层(n = 24)和根管治疗(n = 4)。冠部材料之间并发症的发生率没有显着差异(p = 0.60)。必须更换二十个牙冠(第1组中的六个聚合物牙冠,第2组中的九个聚合物牙冠,对照组中的四个牙冠,以及第一组中的一颗牙齿)。试验组的平均菌斑和牙龈指数与对照组没有差异。结论在四年的中位随访期内,尽管复合冠的毁灭性故障发生率更高,但有无玻璃纤维框架的后聚合物冠的临床表现与金属陶瓷冠的临床表现并无显着差异。比金属陶瓷冠的临床意义根据研究结果,后聚合物牙冠可能是金属陶瓷牙冠的替代方法,尽管仍需要进行其他研究,然后才能毫无保留地推荐它们作为永久性修复体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号