Error uncertainty analysis of GPCP monthly rainfall products: a data-based simulation study

摘要

This paper focuses on estimating the error uncertainty of the monthly 2.5 deg X 2.5 deg rainfall products of the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) using rain gauge observations. Two kinds of GPCP products are evaluated: the satellite-only (MS) product, and the satellite-gauge (SG) merged product. The error variance separation (EVS) method has been proposed previously as a means of estimating the error uncertainty of the GPCP products. In this paper, the accuracy of the EVS results isexamined for a variety of gauge densities. Three validation sites--two in North Dakota and one in Thailand--all with a large number of rain gauges, were selected. The very high density of the selected sites justifies the assumption that the errors are negligible if all gauges are used. Monte Carlo simulation studies were performed to evaluate sampling uncertainty for selected rain gauge network densities. Results are presented in terras of EVS error uncertainty normalized by the true error uncertainty.These results show that the accuracy of the EVS error uncertainty estimates for the SG product differs from that of the MS product. The key factors that affect the errors of the EVS results, such as the gauge density, the gauge network, and the sample size, have been identified and their influence has been quantified. One major finding of this study is that 8-10 gauges, at the 2.5 deg scale, are required as a minimum to get good error uncertainty estimates for the SG products from the EVS method. For eight or more gauges, the normalized error uncertainty is about 0.86 +- 0.10 (North Dakota: box 1) and 0.95 +- 0.10 (North Dakota: box 2). Results show that, despite its error, the EVS method performs better than the root-mean-square error (rmse) approachthat ignores the rain gauge sampling error. For the MS products, both the EVS method and the rmse approach give negligible bias. As expected, results show that the SG products give better rainfall estimates than the MS products, according to most of thecriteria used.