首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology >An Evaluation of Two NEXRAD Wind Retrieval Methodologies and Their Use in Atmospheric Dispersion Models
【24h】

An Evaluation of Two NEXRAD Wind Retrieval Methodologies and Their Use in Atmospheric Dispersion Models

机译:两种NEXRAD取风方法的评估及其在大气弥散模型中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two entirely different methods for retrieving 3D fields of horizontal winds from Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) radial velocities have been evaluated using radar wind profiler measurements to determine whether routine wind retrievals would beuseful for atmospheric dispersion model applications. The first method uses a physical algorithm based on four-dimensional variational data assimilation, and the second simpler method uses a statistical technique based on an analytic formulation of the background error covariance. Both methods can be run in near-real time, but the simpler method was executed about 2.5 times as fast as the four-dimensional variational method. The observed multiday and diurnal variations in wind speed and direction were reproduced by both methods below —1.5 km above the ground in the vicinity of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, during July 2003. However, wind retrievals overestimated the strength of the nighttime low-level jet by as much as 65%. The wind speeds and directions obtained from both methods were usually similar when compared with profiler measurements, and neither method outperformed the other statistically. Within a dispersion model framework, the 3D wind fields and transport patterns were often better representedwhen the wind retrievals were included along with operational data. Despite uncertainties in the wind speed and direction obtained from the wind retrievals that are higher than those from remote sensing radar wind profilers, the inclusion of the wind retrievals is likely to produce more realistic temporal variations in the winds aloft than would be obtained by interpolation using the available radiosondes, especially during rapidly changing synoptic- and mesoscale conditions.
机译:已经使用雷达风廓线仪测量评估了两种完全不同的方法来从下一代气象雷达(NEXRAD)径向速度中提取水平风的3D场,以确定常规的风能回收对于大气弥散模型应用是否有用。第一种方法使用基于四维变化数据同化的物理算法,第二种简单方法使用基于背景误差协方差的解析公式的统计技术。两种方法都可以近乎实时地运行,但是较简单的方法执行速度约为四维变分方法的2.5倍。在2003年7月,俄克拉荷马州俄克拉何马城附近地面以下1.5公里以下,两种方法都再现了观测到的风速和风向的昼夜变化。然而,风的获取高估了夜间低空急流的强度高达65%与廓线仪的测量结果相比,从这两种方法获得的风速和风向通常是相似的,而且两种方法在统计上都没有优于另一种方法。在弥散模型框架内,将风的取回和运行数据一起包括在内时,通常可以更好地表示3D风场和运输方式。尽管从取风中获得的风速和方向的不确定性高于从遥感雷达风廓线仪获得的不确定性,但与使用插值法使用插值获得的风相比,包含风取回可能会在更高的风中产生更现实的时间变化。可用的探空仪,特别是在天气和中尺度快速变化的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号