首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology >Rainfall intensity estimation by ground-based dual-frequency microwave radiometers
【24h】

Rainfall intensity estimation by ground-based dual-frequency microwave radiometers

机译:地面双频微波辐射计估算降雨强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many investigators have used satellite data to derive rainfall intensity and to compare them with rain gauge data. However, there has always been a problem: what is the optimal time period for the two different types of data? A set of well-controlled data collected by ground-based dual-frequency microwave radiometers at the National Central University (24.9 deg N, 121.1 deg E) in Taiwan between January of 1996 and December of 1997 was used to find the answer. The results show that a 1-h interval would be the optimal time period and that hourly data will provide a better accuracy than other options (5, 10, or 30 min or 2 h). Two algorithms, the differential and the brightness temperature, were established to estimate rainfall intensity using ground-based dual-frequency microwave brightness temperature and rain gauge data. The results show that the root-mean-square error and the correlation coefficient are 0.63 mm h~(-1) and 0.88, respectively, for the differential method, and 0.91 mm h~(-1) and 0.71 for the brightness temperature method. The analysis also shows that because the atmospheric background and environmental influence in the continuous observations are identical, the changes in brightness temperature are only caused from the changes inliquid water content in the air. That probably made the differential method a better choice for rainfall intensity estimation than the brightness temperature method. Moreover, ground-based radiometers measure downwelling radiation from bottom up, and little ice-particle scattering or horizontal inhomogeneity is involved. The results can be compared with retrievals from satellite microwave radiometers for a better understanding of the physics of microwave emission and scattering due to raindrops or ice particles.
机译:许多研究人员已使用卫星数据得出降雨强度并将其与雨量计数据进行比较。但是,始终存在一个问题:两种不同类型的数据的最佳时间段是多少?为了寻找答案,使用了台湾国立中央大学的地面双频微波辐射计在1996年1月至1997年12月之间收集的一组控制良好的数据。结果表明,以1小时为间隔是最佳时间段,并且每小时数据将比其他选项(5、10或30分钟或2小时)提供更高的准确性。建立了两种算法,分别是微分和亮度温度,以使用基于地面的双频微波亮度温度和雨量计数据来估算降雨强度。结果表明,微分法的均方根误差和相关系数分别为0.63 mm h〜(-1)和0.88,亮度温度法的均方根误差和相关系数分别为0.91 mm h〜(-1)和0.71。 。分析还表明,由于连续观测中的大气背景和环境影响是相同的,因此亮度温度的变化仅是由空气中液态水含量的变化引起的。这可能使差分方法比亮度温度方法成为降雨强度估算的更好选择。此外,基于地面的辐射计可测量自下而上的下行辐射,并且几乎不涉及冰粒散射或水平不均匀性。可以将结果与卫星微波辐射计的检索结果进行比较,以更好地理解由于雨滴或冰粒引起的微波发射和散射的物理原理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号