...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology >TRMM precipitation radar reflectivity profiles as compared with high-resolution airborne and ground-based radar measurements
【24h】

TRMM precipitation radar reflectivity profiles as compared with high-resolution airborne and ground-based radar measurements

机译:TRMM降水雷达反射率曲线与高分辨率机载和地面雷达测量结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Orbital Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) precipitation radar (PR) products are evaluated by simultaneous comparisons with high-resolution data from the high-altitude ER-2 Doppler radar (EDOP) and ground-based radars. The purpose is not to calibrate any radar or to validate surface rainfall estimates, but rather to evaluate the vertical reflectivity structure, which is important in TRMM rain-type classification and estimation of latent heating profiles. The radars used in this study have considerably different viewing geometries and resolutions, demanding nontrivial mapping procedures in common earth-relative coordinates. Mapped vertical cross sections and mean profiles of reflectivity from the PR, EDOP, and ground-based radars are compared for six cases. These cases cover a stratiform frontal rainband, convective cells of various sizes and stages, and a hurricane. For precipitating systems larger than the PR footprint size, PR reflectivity profiles compare very well with high-resolution measurements thresholded to the PR minimum reflectivity, and derived variables such as bright- band height and rain types are accurate, even at off-nadir PR scan angles. Convective rainfall is marked by high-horizontal reflectivity gradients; therefore its reflectivity distribution is spread out because of the PR antenna illumination pattern and by nonuniform beamfilling effects. In these cases, rain-type classification may err and be biased toward the stratiform type, and the average reflectivity tends to be underestimated. The limited sensitivity of the PR implies that large portions of the upper regions of precipitation systems remain undetected. This implication applies to all cases, but the discrepancy is larger for smaller cells for which limited sensitivity is compounded by incomplete beamfilling. These findings have important implications for gridded TRMM products such as monthly mean rainfall.
机译:通过同时比较来自高空ER-2多普勒雷达(EDOP)和地基雷达的高分辨率数据,评估了轨道热带降雨测量任务(TRMM)降水雷达(PR)产品。目的不是校准任何雷达或验证地表降雨估计,而是评估垂直反射率结构,这在TRMM降雨类型分类和潜热剖面估计中很重要。本研究中使用的雷达具有不同的观测几何形状和分辨率,要求在相对于地球的普通坐标中进行简单的映射程序。比较了六种情况下PR,EDOP和地面雷达的映射垂直截面和反射率的平均分布。这些案例涵盖了层状的正面雨带,各种大小和阶段的对流单元以及飓风。对于大于PR足迹尺寸的降水系统,PR反射率剖面图与以PR最小反射率为阈值的高分辨率测量结果相比非常好,即使在离天底PR扫描时,派生变量(例如亮带高度和降雨类型)也很准确角度。对流降雨以高水平反射率梯度为特征;因此,由于PR天线的照射方式和不均匀的波束填充效应,其反射率分布会散布开来。在这些情况下,雨型分类可能会出错并偏向于层状型,并且平均反射率往往会被低估。 PR的敏感性有限,意味着大部分降水系统上部区域仍未被发现。此含义适用于所有情况,但是对于较小的小区,其差异会更大,对于这种情况,有限的灵敏度会因不完全的​​波束填充而变得更加复杂。这些发现对网格TRMM产品(例如月平均降雨量)具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号