首页> 外文期刊>Journal of drug assessment >Cost effectiveness of asthma treatment with a breath-actuated pressurised metered dose inhaler (BAI)-a prescribing claims study of 1856 patients using a traditional pressurised metered dose inhaler (MDI) or a breathactuated device
【24h】

Cost effectiveness of asthma treatment with a breath-actuated pressurised metered dose inhaler (BAI)-a prescribing claims study of 1856 patients using a traditional pressurised metered dose inhaler (MDI) or a breathactuated device

机译:使用呼吸加压加压吸入器(BAI)治疗哮喘的成本效益-一项处方声明研究使用传统加压加压吸入器(MDI)或呼吸加压装置对1856名患者进行了研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

High levels of asthma resource use in the UK indicate that optimal control is not being achieved. This may be at least partly due to improper inhaler technique with metered dose inhalers (MDIs). One solution may be to prescribe inhalers that are easier to use, i.e. breath-actuated inhalers (BAIs). This analysis used a primary care database to assess the extent to which BAI (Easi-Breathe) patients differ from MDI patients in terms of their asthma related-resource costs. A child using the BAI had annual asthma medication costs that were £16.83 higher than a child using an MDI and an adult using the BAI had medication costs that were £3.02 higher. This was expected due to the higher unit cost of the salbutamol BAI compared to the salbutamol MDI. However, a breakdown of medication costs showed that antibiotic and oral steroid costs were lower in the BAI group. The higher medication costs for BAI users were offset by the lower non-medication costs (£46.57 and £69.09 less for children and adults using the BAI, respectively). The result was a lower cost overall for BAI users compared to MDI users. Asthma is a therapeutic area which imposes a significant burden on both patients and health services. Given its increasing prevalence and morbidity levels, it is important to ensure that all possible steps are taken by clinicians to reduce this burden wherever possible. Such steps may include the prescription of BAIs.
机译:在英国,哮喘资源的大量使用表明无法实现最佳控制。这可能至少部分是由于计量吸入器(MDI)的吸入器技术不正确。一种解决方案是开具更易于使用的吸入器,即呼吸致动吸入器(BAI)。该分析使用初级保健数据库评估了BAI(简易呼吸)患者与MDI患者在哮喘相关资源成本方面的差异。与使用MDI的儿童相比,使用BAI的儿童的年度哮喘药物治疗费用高出£16.83,而使用BAI的成年人的年度哮喘药物治疗费用高出£ 3.02。预计这是由于沙丁胺醇BAI的单位成本高于沙丁胺醇MDI。但是,药物费用的细分显示,BAI组的抗生素和口服类固醇费用较低。 BAI使用者较高的药物费用被较低的非药物费用所抵消(使用BAI的儿童和成人分别减少了46.57英镑和69.09英镑)。结果是,与MDI用户相比,BAI用户的总体成本更低。哮喘是一个治疗领域,对患者和医疗服务均构成重大负担。鉴于其患病率和发病率水平不断提高,重要的是要确保临床医生采取所有可能的步骤以尽可能减少这种负担。这样的步骤可以包括开具BAI的处方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号