首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (2) results of non-standardized analytes and transference of reference intervals to the participating laboratories on the basis of cross-comparison of test results
【24h】

The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (2) results of non-standardized analytes and transference of reference intervals to the participating laboratories on the basis of cross-comparison of test results

机译:协作推导参考区间的亚洲项目:(2)非标准分析物的结果,以及根据测试结果的交叉比较将参考区间转移到参与实验室

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The 2009 Asian multicenter study for derivation of reference intervals (RIs) featured: 1) centralized measurements to exclude reagent-dependent variations; 2) inclusion of non-standardized analytes (hormones, tumor makers, etc.) in the target; and 3) cross-check of test results between the central and local laboratories. Transferability of centrally derived RIs for non-standardized analytes based on the cross-check was examined. Methods: Forty non-standardized analytes were centrally measured in sera from 3541 reference individuals recruited by 63 laboratories. Forty-four laboratories collaborated in the cross-check study by locally measuring aliquots of sera from 9 to 73 volunteers (average 22.2). Linear relationships were obtained by the major-axis regression. Error in converting RIs using the regression line was expressed by the coefficient of variation of slope b [CV(b)]. CV(b) <10% was set as the cut-off value allowing the conversion. The significance of factors for partitioning RIs was determined similarly as in the first report. Results: Significant sex-, age-, and region-related changes in test results were observed in 17, 15, and 11 of the 40 analytes, respectively. In the cross-comparison study, test results were not harmonized in the majority of immunologically measured analytes, but their average CV(b)s were <10% except for total protein, cystatin C, CA19-9, free thyroxine, and triiodothyronine. After conversion, 74% of centrally derived RIs were transferred to each local laboratory. Conclusions: Our results point to the feasibility of: 1) harmonizing test results across different laboratories; and 2) sharing centrally derived RIs of non-standardized analytes by means of comparative measurement of a set of commutable specimens.
机译:背景:2009年亚洲参考中心(RIs)派生多中心研究的特点:1)集中测量以排除试剂依赖性变化; 2)在目标中包含非标准化分析物(激素,肿瘤发生物等); 3)在中央实验室和地方实验室之间对测试结果进行交叉检查。基于交叉检查,检查了中心衍生的RI对于非标准化分析物的可转移性。方法:从63个实验室招募的3541名参考人的血清中集中测量了40种非标准化分析物。 44个实验室通过对9到73名志愿者的血清等分试样进行局部测量,进行了交叉检查研究(平均22.2)。通过主轴回归获得线性关系。使用回归线转换RI时的误差由斜率b [CV(b)]的变化系数表示。将CV(b)<10%设置为允许转换的临界值。与第一次报告中类似,确定了划分RI的因素的重要性。结果:分别在40种分析物中的17、15和11中观察到了与性别,年龄和地区相关的测试结果的显着变化。在交叉比较研究中,大多数免疫学分析物的测试结果均不一致,但是除总蛋白,半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂C,CA19-9,游离甲状腺素和三碘甲状腺素外,它们的平均CV(b)s <10%。转换后,将74%的集中派生的RI转移到每个本地实验室。结论:我们的结果表明了以下可行性:1)统一不同实验室的测试结果; 2)通过对一组可交换标本进行比较测量,共享非标准化分析物的中心衍生RI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号