首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Comparison of rofecoxib and oxycodone plus acetaminophen in the treatment of acute pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain in the third molar extraction model.
【24h】

Comparison of rofecoxib and oxycodone plus acetaminophen in the treatment of acute pain: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain in the third molar extraction model.

机译:罗非考昔与羟考酮加对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性疼痛的比较:在第三磨牙摘除模型中对中度至重度术后疼痛的患者进行的一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Opiates, acetaminophen, nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors such as rofecoxib are used in the treatment of acute pain because of their anti-inflammatory and/or analgesic properties. Rofecoxib has demonstrated an improved gastrointestinal safety profile compared with nonselective NSAIDs. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and tolerability profile of rofecoxib 50 mg with those of the centrally acting, nonsalicylate, opiateonopiate analgesic combination oxycodone/acetominophen [Formula: see text] in patients with pain after dental surgery. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled study, patients experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain after extraction of >/=2 third molars (including >/=1 mandibular impaction) received a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg, oxycodone/acetaminophen [Formula: see text], or placebo. End points included totalpain relief over 6 hours (TOPAR6, the primary end point) and 4 hours (TOPAR4), patient's global assessment of treatment at 6 hours (GLOBAL6) and 24 hours (GLOBAL24), summed pain intensity difference over 6 hours (SPID6), onset of analgesic effect (time to perceptible/meaningful pain relief, using a 2-stopwatch method), peak pain relief (PEAKPR), peak pain intensity difference (PEAKPID), and duration of analgesic effect (time to use of rescue analgesia). Results: Two hundred twelve patients (63% female, 37% male; 76% white, 24% other; mean [SD] age, 20.9 [4.4] years; age range, 16-41 years) were enrolled in the study and received a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg (n = 90), oxycodone/acetaminophen [Formula: see text] (n = 91), or placebo (n = 31). The analgesic effect of rofecoxib was significantly greater than that of oxycodone/acetaminophen at [Formula: see text] for TOPAR6, TOPAR4, GLOBAL6, GLOBAL24, and SPID6; at [Formula: see text] for PEAKPR and PEAKPID; and at [Formula: see text] for median time to use of rescue analgesia. Significantly fewer patients in the rofecoxib group (72.2%) took rescue analgesia within 24 hours postdose compared with the oxycodone/acetaminophen group (94.5%; [Formula: see text] ) and the placebo group (96.8%; [Formula: see text] ). Both active treatments were similar with respect to onset of analgesic effect. Both were generally well tolerated; the overall incidence of adverse experiences in the rofecoxib, oxycodone/acetaminophen, and placebo groups was 51.1%, 64.8%, and 48.4%, respectively. Rofecoxib was associated with a significantly lower incidence of nausea (18.9% vs 39.6%; [Formula: see text] ) and vomiting (6.7% vs 23.1%; [Formula: see text] ) compared with oxycodone/acetaminophen. Conclusions: In study patients with moderate to severe pain after dental surgery, rofecoxib 50 mg had a greater analgesic effect than oxycodone/acetaminophen [Formula: see text] mg and was associated with less nausea and vomiting.
机译:背景:阿片类药物,对乙酰氨基酚,非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和环氧合酶2选择性抑制剂(如罗非昔布)因其抗炎和/或镇痛作用而用于急性疼痛的治疗。与非选择性NSAID相比,罗非昔布已证明改善了胃肠道的安全性。目的:本研究的目的是比较罗非考昔50 mg与中性,非水杨酸,阿片/非阿片镇痛镇痛药羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛效果和耐受性概况[公式:参见文本] 。方法:在这项随机,双盲,安慰剂和活性比较剂对照研究中,拔除> / = 2第三磨牙(包括> / = 1下颌撞击)后经历中度至重度术后疼痛的患者接受单剂口服罗非昔布50 mg,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚[公式:参见文字]或安慰剂。终点包括6小时(TOPAR6,主要终点)和4小时(TOPAR4)的总疼痛缓解,患者在6小时(GLOBAL6)和24小时(GLOBAL24)的总体治疗评估,总计6小时疼痛强度差异(SPID6) ),止痛作用的发作(使用2秒表法的时间可感觉到的/有意义的止痛时间),峰值止痛(PEAKPR),峰值止痛强度差异(PEAKPID)和止痛作用的持续时间(使用抢救性止痛的时间) )。结果:纳入研究的212例患者(女性63%,男性37%;白人76%,其他24%;平均[SD]年龄,20.9 [4.4]岁;年龄范围:16-41岁)罗非考昔单次口服剂量50 mg(n = 90),羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚[公式:参见文本](n = 91)或安慰剂(n = 31)。罗非昔布的镇痛作用明显大于羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛作用[公式:见正文],TOPAR6,TOPAR4,GLOBAL6,GLOBAL24和SPID6的镇痛作用。有关PEAKPR和PEAKPID的信息,请参见[公式:参见文本];并在[公式:参见文字]中获得使用急救镇痛的中位数时间。与羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚组(94.5%; [公式:参见正文])和安慰剂组(96.8%; [公式:参见正文])相比,罗非昔布组在用药后24小时内接受抢救镇痛的患者明显减少(72.2%)。 )。就止痛作用的发作而言,两种有效的治疗方法都是相似的。两者一般都耐受良好;罗非昔布,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚和安慰剂组不良反应的总发生率分别为51.1%,64.8%和48.4%。与羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚相比,罗非考昔与恶心(18.9%vs. 39.6%; [公式:参见文本])和呕吐(6.7%vs 23.1%; [公式:参见文本])的发生率显着降低。结论:在接受牙科手术后中度至重度疼痛的研究患者中,罗非昔布50 mg的镇痛作用比羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚的镇痛作用大。并且,恶心和呕吐的发生率也较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号