...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief with rizatriptan 10 mg and prescription usual-care oral medications in the acute treatment of migraine headaches: a multicenter, prospective, open-label, two-attack, crossover study.
【24h】

Time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief with rizatriptan 10 mg and prescription usual-care oral medications in the acute treatment of migraine headaches: a multicenter, prospective, open-label, two-attack, crossover study.

机译:在急性偏头痛的急性治疗中,使用利扎曲普坦10毫克和处方常规护理口服药物缓解疼痛的时间和疼痛发作的时间:一项多中心,前瞻性,开放标签,两次发作,交叉研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Patients and physicians consider rapid onset of pain relief and pain freedom among the most important attributes of migraine therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effectiveness of rizatriptan 10 mg and usual-care oral migraine medications in everyday clinical practice settings. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label study. Adult patients treated 2 sequential migraine attacks with rizatriptan 10 mg and a usual-care prescription migraine medication in a crossover manner. Patients chose which medication to take first. They recorded the treatment outcomes using a stopwatch and a treatment diary. End points included time to pain freedom (length of time from dosing to no pain) and time to onset of pain relief (mean time to onset of pain relief and proportion of patients reporting onset of pain relief at 30 minutes), satisfaction with treatment, and medication preference. Information on adverse events was collected through the normal post-marketing reporting mechanism. Comparisons were made using the paired t test and McNemar test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A mixed model, accounting for multiple observations per patient, was fitted for the time to pain freedom, controlling for age, sex, treatment period, medication, and headache severity. RESULTS: Of 2346 enrolled patients, 1489 treated 2 migraines in a crossover manner and were included in the analysis (86.8% women, 13.2% men; mean age, 41.7 years). A majority of patients (80.6%) treated both migraines with oral triptans. The most commonly used nontriptans were NSAIDs (5.4%), butalbital-containing combinations (4.3%), and isometheptene (3.4%). Over-the-counter medications were used by 22.3% of patients during rizatriptan-treated attacks and by 28.9% of patients during attacks treated with usual-care medications. The mean time to pain freedom was significantly shorter when an attack was treated with rizatriptan compared with usual-care medications (222 vs 298 minutes, respectively; P<0.001), andthe onset of pain relief was significantly more rapid (85 vs 107 minutes; P=0.003), with significant differences noted as early as 15 minutes after dosing (P<0.001). The findings remained similar after adjustment for potential confounding factors. No significant sequence effect was detected. Significantly more patients reported being very satisfied or satisfied with rizatriptan compared with usual-care medications (65.4% vs 57.7%; P<0.001) and preferred rizatriptan (58.0% vs 42.0%; P<0.001). One female patient reported having hives and itchy skin the day after taking rizatriptan; the symptoms subsided after treatment with methylprednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected population, treatment of a migraine attack with rizatriptan 10 mg was associated with a faster time to pain freedom and onset of pain relief compared with treatment with usual-care oral migraine medications. Patients reported greater satisfaction with and preference for rizatriptan.
机译:背景:患者和医生认为,快速缓解疼痛和缓解疼痛是偏头痛治疗的最重要属性之一。目的:本研究比较了利扎曲普坦10 mg和日常护理口服偏头痛药物在日常临床实践中的有效性。方法:这是一项多中心,前瞻性,开放性研究。成年患者用利扎曲普坦10 mg和常规护理偏头痛药物交叉治疗两次连续性偏头痛发作。患者选择先服用哪种药物。他们使用秒表和治疗日记记录了治疗结果。终点包括无痛时间(从服药到无痛的时间)和疼痛缓解的时间(疼痛缓解的平均时间以及30分钟后疼痛缓解的患者比例),治疗满意度,和药物偏好。有关不良事件的信息是通过正常的上市后报告机制收集的。使用配对t检验和McNemar检验分别对连续变量和分类变量进行了比较。拟合混合模型,该模型考虑了每个患者的多次观察结果,从而获得了无痛时间,控制了年龄,性别,治疗时间,药物治疗和头痛的严重程度。结果:在2346名入组患者中,有1489名以交叉方式治疗了2例偏头痛,并纳入分析(女性86.8%,男性13.2%;平均年龄41.7岁)。大多数患者(80.6%)均使用口服曲坦类药物治疗了两个偏头痛。最常用的非曲普坦类药物是非甾体抗炎药(5.4%),含丁比妥的组合(4.3%)和异丁烯(3.4%)。在使用利扎曲普坦治疗的发作中,非处方药的使用率为22.3%,在使用常规护理药物治疗的发作中,使用非处方药的患者为28.9%。与常规护理药物相比,使用利扎曲普坦治疗发作时的平均无痛时间明显缩短(分别为222和298分钟; P <0.001),并且疼痛缓解的发生明显更快(85和107分钟; P = 0.003),最早在给药后15分钟就注意到显着差异(P <0.001)。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整之后,研究结果仍然相似。没有检测到明显的序列效应。与常规护理药物(65.4%比57.7%; P <0.001)和首选利扎曲普坦(58.0%比42.0%; P <0.001)相比,有更多患者对利扎曲普坦感到非常满意或满意。一名女性患者报告说服用利扎曲普坦后的第二天有荨麻疹和皮肤瘙痒。用甲泼尼龙治疗后症状消失。结论:在这个选定的人群中,与常规护理口服偏头痛药物相比,使用瑞扎曲普坦10 mg治疗偏头痛发作可更快地缓解疼痛并缓解疼痛。患者报告对利扎曲普坦的满意度更高,更喜欢使用利扎曲坦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号