首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Long-term effects of glimepiride or rosiglitazone in combination with metformin on blood pressure control in type 2 diabetic patients affected by the metabolic syndrome: a 12-month, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
【24h】

Long-term effects of glimepiride or rosiglitazone in combination with metformin on blood pressure control in type 2 diabetic patients affected by the metabolic syndrome: a 12-month, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

机译:格列美脲或罗格列酮联合二甲双胍对受代谢综合征影响的2型糖尿病患者的血压控制的长期影响:一项为期12个月的双盲随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Some evidence suggests that antihyperglycemic drugs might have a small but clinically significant beneficial effect on blood pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus. Based on a literature search, few direct comparisons of different antihyperglycemic treatments on blood pressure have been reported. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the present study was to compare the effect of long-term (12-month) combination treatment with glimepiride or rosiglitazone plus metformin on blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2) and the metabolic syndrome. Secondary end points were glycemic control and improvement in insulin sensitivity. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study was conducted at 2 centers in Italy. Patients aged > or =18 years with DM-2 and the metabolic syndrome and poor glycemic control (insulin resistance) with monotherapy with the maximum tolerated dose of an antihyperglycemic agent (eg, a sulfonylurea, metformin) were enrolled. All patients received 12 months of oral treatment with metformin 500 mg TID plus glimepiride 2 mg QD (G + M) or rosiglitazone 4 mg QD (R + M). Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and body mass index (BMI); plasma levels of fasting and postprandial glucose and insulin (FPG, PPG, FPI, and PPI, respectively) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)); and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index were determined at 0 (baseline), 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment. Adverse effects (AEs) were assessed using spontaneous reporting, patient interview, and laboratory analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study; 95 completed it (48 men, 47 women; mean age, 54 years [range, 47-58 years]; G + M, 47 patients; R + M, 48 patients). Four patients did not complete the study due to noncompliance (2 patients in the R + M group), protocol violation (1 patient in the G + M group), and loss to follow-up (1 patient in the G + M group). Mean blood pressure values were not significantly improved in the G + M group at any time point, whereas these values were significantly improved at 12 months in the R + M group. Mean BMI, HbA(1c), FPG, and PPG were significantly decreased from baseline in both groups at 12 months (all, P < or = 0.05). Mean FPI, PPI, and HOMA index were significantly improved at 12 months only in the R + M group (all, P < or = 0.05 vs baseline); these changes were not found in the G + M group. No significant changes in HR were found. Headache and flatulence were reported in both groups (G + M, 2 patients each; R + M, 1 and 2 patients, respectively), but these AEs were mild and transient. In the R + M group, liver enzyme levels were increased to 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal in 3 patients, but were normalized by study end. CONCLUSIONS: In this study in patients with DM-2 and the metabolic syndrome, long-term (12-month) combination treatment with R + M, but not G + M, was associated with a significant improvement in blood pressure control. Improvements in glycemic control and insulin resistance-related parameters were found at 9 months with R + M, compared with 12 months with G + M. Both treatments were well tolerated.
机译:背景:一些证据表明,降糖药对糖尿病患者的血压可能具有很小的临床意义,但在临床上具有明显的有益作用。根据文献检索,很少有直接的比较将不同的降糖药对血压进行比较。目的:本研究的主要目的是比较长期(12个月)联合格列美脲或罗格列酮联合二甲双胍治疗对2型糖尿病(DM-2)和代谢综合征患者的血压影响。次要终点是血糖控制和胰岛素敏感性改善。方法:这项随机,双盲研究在意大利的2个中心进行。纳入年龄≥18岁且患有DM-2和代谢综合征且血糖控制不佳(胰岛素抵抗)且单药治疗且最大耐受剂量为降糖药(例如磺酰脲,二甲双胍)的患者。所有患者均接受口服二甲双胍500 mg TID加格列美脲2 mg QD(G + M)或罗格列酮4 mg QD(R + M)口服治疗12个月。血压,心率(HR)和体重指数(BMI);空腹和餐后血糖和胰岛素(分别为FPG,PPG,FPI和PPI)和糖基化血红蛋白(HbA(1c))的血浆水平;在治疗0(基线),3、6、9和12个月时测定稳态模型评估(HOMA)指数。使用自发报告,患者访谈和实验室分析评估不良反应(AE)。结果:99名患者被纳入研究。 95例完成了手术(48例男性,47例女性;平均年龄54岁[范围47-58岁]; G + M,47例; R + M,48例)。四名患者由于不依从(R + M组中的2名患者),违反规程(G + M组中的1名患者)和随访失败(G + M组中的1名患者)而未能完成研究。在任何时候,G + M组的平均血压值均未显着改善,而在R + M组中,这些血压值在12个月时均显着提高。两组在12个月时的平均BMI,HbA(1c),FPG和PPG均较基线显着降低(所有,P <或= 0.05)。仅在R + M组中,平均FPI,PPI和HOMA指数在12个月时才显着改善(所有,相对于基线,P <或= 0.05);这些变化在G + M组中找不到。没有发现HR的显着变化。两组均报告有头痛和肠胃气胀(G + M,每组2例; R + M,分别为1和2例),但这些AE属于轻度和短暂性。在R + M组中,3例患者的肝酶水平增至正常上限的1.5倍,但在研究结束前已恢复正常。结论:在这项针对DM-2和代谢综合征的患者的研究中,R + M而非G + M的长期(12个月)联合治疗可显着改善血压控制。 R + M组在9个月时血糖控制和胰岛素抵抗相关参数得到改善,而G + M组则为12个月。两种疗法的耐受性都很好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号