首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with inadequately controlled chronic pain related to cancer and other disorders: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Analgesic efficacy and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine in patients with inadequately controlled chronic pain related to cancer and other disorders: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:丁丙诺啡经皮的镇痛效果和耐受性在与癌症和其他疾病有关的慢性疼痛控制不当的患者中:一项多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is a potent opioid analgesic that is available in sublingual and parenteral formulations. A new formulation, buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (TDS), has been developed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of the 3 available dosages of buprenorphine TDS (35.0, 52.5, and 70.0 microg/h) with placebo. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Patients with chronic, severe pain related to cancer or other diseases and inadequately controlled with weak opioids were randomized to receive buprenorphine TDS 35.0, 52.5, or 70.0 microg/h or placebo patch for up to 15 days. A new patch was applied every 72 hours, for a total of 5 patches. All patients were permitted rescue analgesia with sublingual buprenorphine tablets (0.2 mg) as required for breakthrough pain. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients (86 women, 71 men; mean [SD] age, 58.7 [11.8] years) were initially enrolled in the study. Buprenorphine TDS was associated with significantly higher response rates than was placebo at the 35.0- and 52.5-microg/h dosages (36.6% and 47.5%, respectively, vs 16.2%; P=0.032 and P=0.003, respectively) and a numerically higher response rate at 70.0 microg/h (33.3%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patients treated with buprenorphine TDS experienced a 56.7% reduction in use of sublingual rescue analgesic during the study compared with an 8% reduction with the placebo patch. A total of 43.5% of patients treated with buprenorphine TDS reported good or complete pain relief compared with 32.4% in the placebo group. Pain intensity decreased in a dose-dependent manner with buprenorphine TDS, and the duration of sleep uninterrupted by pain was improved by the end of the study. More than three fourths (78.8%) of patients in the placebo and buprenorphine TDS groups reported at least 1 adverse event (AE) during the study. The most common AEs were central nervous system and gastrointestinal symptoms. The majority of treatment-related AEs were mild or moderate in intensity and were typical of those occurring at the beginning of therapy with a strong opioid. CONCLUSIONS: Buprenorphine TDS was shown to be an effective analgesic against chronic, severe pain in this study population. Patients treated with this new formulation of buprenorphine showed improved duration of sleep and reduced need for additional oral analgesics.
机译:背景:丁丙诺啡是一种有效的阿片类镇痛药,可用于舌下和肠胃外制剂。已经开发出一种新的制剂丁丙诺啡透皮递送系统(TDS)。目的:本研究的目的是比较3种有效剂量丁丙诺啡TDS(35.0、52.5和70.0 microg / h)与安慰剂的镇痛效果和耐受性。方法:这是一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,多中心研究。患有与癌症或其他疾病相关的慢性,严重疼痛且阿片类药物控制不足的患者被随机分配接受丁丙诺啡TDS 35.0、52.5或70.0 microg / h或安慰剂贴片治疗,最多持续15天。每72小时应用一个新补丁,总共5个补丁。根据突破性疼痛的需要,所有患者均接受舌下丁丙诺啡片(0.2 mg)抢救镇痛。结果:总共有157名患者(86名女性,71名男性;平均[SD]年龄,58.7 [11.8]岁)被纳入研究。丁丙诺啡TDS在35.0微克/小时和52.5微克/小时的剂量下与安慰剂相比具有显着更高的响应率(分别为36.6%和47.5%,对16.2%; P = 0.032和P = 0.003),并且数值更高响应速度为70.0 microg / h(33.3%),尽管这种差异未达到统计学意义。在研究期间,使用丁丙诺啡TDS治疗的患者使用舌下急救镇痛剂的次数减少了56.7%,而使用安慰剂贴片的患者减少了8%。接受丁丙诺啡TDS治疗的患者中,总疼痛缓解率为43.5%,而安慰剂组为32.4%。丁丙诺啡TDS的疼痛强度呈剂量依赖性降低,并且到研究结束时,改善了不因疼痛而中断的睡眠时间。在研究期间,安慰剂和丁丙诺啡TDS组中超过四分之三(78.8%)的患者报告至少发生了1次不良事件(AE)。最常见的AE是中枢神经系统和胃肠道症状。大多数与治疗有关的AE强度为轻度或中度,是典型的在阿片类药物强效治疗开始时出现的AE。结论:在该研究人群中,丁丙诺啡TDS被证明是一种有效的镇痛剂,可缓解慢性剧烈疼痛。用这种新的丁丙诺啡制剂治疗的患者改善了睡眠时间,并减少了对其他口服镇痛药的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号