首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea.
【24h】

A comparative analysis of the impact of a positive list system on new chemical entity drugs and incrementally modified drugs in South Korea.

机译:比较肯定列表系统对韩国新的化学实体药物和增量修饰药物的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Medical costs in South Korea have risen, in part due to increased demand and consumption of pharmaceutical products by an aging population and also because of the introduction of newer, more expensive drugs. In an effort to stabilize the financing of health insurance and alleviate the financial burden on individuals, the government implemented a policy changing the national health insurance drug-listing system from a negative list system to a positive list system (PLS). OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare differences in drug-listing rates for new chemical entities (NCEs) and incrementally modified drugs (IMDs) after South Korea introduced the PLS in December 2006. Parameters significantly affecting NCE and IMD listings were also identified. METHODS: New drug-listing data for 2007 and 2008 were obtained from the databases of the Health Insurance Review Agency and the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Descriptive analyses on the reimbursement rate and logistic regression analysis were conducted. Statistical significance was tested for all results, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 150 reimbursement applications (79 for NCEs, 71 for IMDs) were examined for this study. The overall drug-listing rate was lower than before the introduction of the PLS. Drug reimbursement rates for NCEs (50.6%) were lower than those for IMDs (74.6%) (P = 0.0025). However, the price negotiation rate was 85.0% for NCEs compared with 73.6% for IMDs (P = 0.1847). The time required for both reimbursement and drug pricing was significantly longer for NCE than for IMD listings (P < 0.05). Cost-effectiveness and budget impact were 2 significant variables affecting the listing of NCEs. However, no significant variable was identified for IMDs. CONCLUSIONS: The PLS challenges the drug-listing system by decreasing the drug-listing rate and lengthening the period for reimbursement determinations. These effects were more pronounced for NCE listings than for IMD listings.
机译:背景:韩国的医疗成本上升,部分原因是人口老龄化对药品的需求和消费增加,也由于引入了更新,更昂贵的药物。为了稳定健康保险的融资并减轻个人的财务负担,政府实施了一项政策,将国家健康保险药品清单系统从负面清单系统变为正面清单系统(PLS)。目的:本研究的目的是比较韩国在2006年12月引入PLS后新化学实体(NCE)和增量修饰药物(IMD)的药物上市率的差异。还确定了对NCE和IMD上市有重大影响的参数。方法:从健康保险审查局和厚生省的数据库中获得2007年和2008年的新药上市数据。对报销率进行描述性分析,并进行逻辑回归分析。所有结果均经过统计学显着性检验,P <0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:本研究共检查了150笔报销申请(NCE申请79笔,IMD申请71笔)。总体药物上市率低于引入PLS之前的水平。 NCE的药物报销率(50.6%)低于IMD的药物报销率(74.6%)(P = 0.0025)。但是,NCE的价格协商率为85.0%,IMD的价格协商率为73.6%(P = 0.1847)。 NCE的报销和药品定价所需的时间明显长于IMD的上市时间(P <0.05)。成本效益和预算影响是影响NCE上市的两个重要变量。但是,没有发现IMD的显着变量。结论:PLS通过降低药物上市率和延长报销确定期来挑战药物上市制度。这些影响在NCE列表中比在IMD列表中更为明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号