首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >A single-tablet fixed-dose combination of racemic ibuprofen/paracetamol in the management of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain in adult and adolescent patients: a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, factorial study.
【24h】

A single-tablet fixed-dose combination of racemic ibuprofen/paracetamol in the management of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain in adult and adolescent patients: a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, factorial study.

机译:外消旋布洛芬/扑热息痛的单片固定剂量组合在成人和青少年患者中度至重度术后牙痛的治疗中:多中心,两阶段,随机,双盲,平行组,安慰剂对照,析因研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The combination of ibuprofen and paracetamol may confer analgesic benefits over monotherapy with either agent. In a previous study, an ibuprofen/paracetamol combination provided significantly better analgesic efficacy than comparable doses of ibuprofen or paracetamol alone in patients experiencing moderate to severe acute postoperative pain after extraction of impacted third molars. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of 3 doses of a single-tablet fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ibuprofen and paracetamol (ibuprofen/paracetamol doses of 100 mg/250 mg, 200 mg/500 mg, and 400 mg/1000 mg) with comparable doses of ibuprofen (200 or 400 mg) monotherapy, paracetamol (500 or 1000 mg) monotherapy, and placebo in the 8 hours after surgical removal of 3 to 4 impacted third molars (stage 1) and with placebo over the next 72 hours (stage 2). METHODS: This was a multicenter, 2-stage, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, factorial study. Male or female outpatients were eligible for the study if they were aged >or=16 years, were referred for surgical removal of at least 3 impacted third molars (2 of which had to be mandibular impacted molars), and gave written informed consent. In stage 1, patients were randomly assigned to ibuprofen 200 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, paracetamol 500 mg, paracetamol 1000 mg, FDC ibuprofen 100 mg/paracetamol 250 mg, FDC ibuprofen 200 mg/paracetamol 500 mg, FDC ibuprofen 400 mg/paracetamol 1000 mg, or placebo. In stage 2, patients who had been taking FDC therapy or placebo continued the same treatment, whereas those taking monotherapy received FDC therapy, incorporating the same dose of active monotherapy from stage 1. First-line rescue medication (hydrocodone 7.5 mg and paracetamol 500 mg) was available at any time after dosing; however, in stage 1, any patient who required rescue medication within 60 minutes of receipt of study medication was considered a "dropout" from therapy, and, in stage 2, patients who required >2 doses of first-line rescue medication in a 24-hour period were considered treatment failures. In stage 1, the primary efficacy end points were the sum of pain relief and pain intensity differences over an 8-hour follow-up period (SPRID8) and the pain relief and pain intensity difference scores at each time point (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, and 480 minutes after dosing). Several secondary variables were also measured, including the patient's global assessment of the study medication. The 2-stopwatch method was used for measures of perceptible and meaningful pain relief. In stage 2, the primary efficacy end point was the number of completed 24-hour periods (as 0, 1, 2, or 3) in which the patient required no more than one dose of rescue medication and rated the treatment as "good," "very good," or "excellent." The tolerability of study medications was assessed in relation to the frequency, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs), as well as their relationship to study medication; vital signs were also measured. AEs were assessed at 8 hours after dosing in stage 1, at 72 hours after dosing in stage 2, and at the follow-up visit (7-10 days after surgery); in addition, patients were instructed to report any AE that occurred between scheduled assessments. RESULTS: Of 735 patients randomly assigned in stage 1, a total of 715 (97.3%) entered and 678 (92.2%) completed stage 2. Most patients were female (62.6% [460/735]) and white (91.3% [671/735]); the mean (SD) age was 20.3 (3.5) years and the mean weight was 69.7 (15.7) kg. The mean total impaction score was 11.1 (1.4), and the mean baseline pain score on the visual analog scale was 76.9 (12.0). Overall, 422 of 735 patients (57.4%) reported severe pain at baseline and 313 of 735 (42.6%) reported moderate pain. For the primary efficacy end point (SPRID8), FDC ibuprofen 400 mg/paracetamol 1000 mg was significantly more effective than ibuprofen 400 mg (P = 0.02) and paraceta
机译:背景:布洛芬和扑热息痛的联合使用可能比单药联合使用具有镇痛作用。在先前的研究中,在拔出受影响的第三磨牙后遭受中度至重度急性术后疼痛的患者中,布洛芬/扑热息痛的组合比单独使用同等剂量的布洛芬或扑热息痛的镇痛效果要好得多。目的:本研究比较了3剂量布洛芬和扑热息痛的单片固定剂量组合(FDC)的疗效和耐受性(布洛芬/扑热息痛的剂量分别为100 mg / 250 mg,200 mg / 500 mg和400 mg /手术移除3至4个受影响的第三磨牙(第1阶段)后的8小时内,在同等剂量的布洛芬(200或400 mg)单一疗法,扑热息痛(500或1000 mg)单一疗法和安慰剂的情况下,并在安慰剂治疗期间接下来的72小时(第2阶段)。方法:这是一项多中心,两阶段,随机,双盲,平行组,安慰剂对照,析因研究。年龄大于或等于16岁的男性或女性门诊患者符合资格进行研究,他们被要求手术切除至少3颗受影响的第三磨牙(其中2颗必须是下颌受影响的磨牙),并签署知情同意书。在第1阶段中,患者被随机分配至布洛芬200 mg,布洛芬400 mg,扑热息痛500 mg,扑热息痛1000 mg,FDC布洛芬100 mg /扑热息痛250 mg,FDC布洛芬200 mg /扑热息痛500 mg,FDC布洛芬400 mg /扑热息痛1000毫克或安慰剂。在第2阶段,接受FDC治疗或安慰剂的患者继续相同的治疗,而接受单一疗法的患者接受FDC治疗,并从第1阶段开始采用相同剂量的主动单一疗法。一线急救药物(氢可酮7.5 mg和扑热息痛500 mg )给药后随时可用;但是,在第1阶段中,任何需要在接受研究药物后60分钟内需要抢救药物的患者都被认为是治疗的“辍学”,而在第2阶段中,需要> 2剂量的一线抢救药物的患者在24小时的时间被认为是治疗失败。在第1阶段,主要疗效终点是在8小时的随访期内缓解疼痛和疼痛强度的总和(SPRID8),以及每个时间点的缓解疼痛和疼痛强度的总和得分(15、30、45给药后60、90、120、180、240、300、360、420和480分钟)。还测量了几个次要变量,包括患者对研究药物的总体评估。 2秒表法用于可感觉到的和有意义的疼痛缓解。在第2阶段中,主要疗效终点是完成的24小时周期数(分别为0、1、2或3),其中患者需要的剂量不超过一剂急救药物,并且将治疗评为“良好, ”,“非常好”或“优秀”。根据不良事件的发生频率,性质和严重程度以及与研究药物的关系来评估研究药物的耐受性;还测量了生命体征。在第1阶段给药后8小时,第2阶段给药后72小时以及随访期间(手术后7-10天)评估AE。此外,还指示患者报告计划评估之间发生的任何不良事件。结果:在第1阶段随机分配的735例患者中,共有715例(97.3%)进入了治疗,第2阶段完成了678例(92.2%),大多数患者为女性(62.6%[460/735])和白人(91.3%[671) / 735]);平均(SD)年龄为20.3(3.5)岁,平均体重为69.7(15.7)kg。平均总撞击得分为11.1(1.4),在视觉模拟量表上的平均基线疼痛得分为76.9(12.0)。总体而言,735名患者中的422名(57.4%)在基线时出现严重疼痛,而735名患者中的313名(42.6%)报告中度疼痛。对于主要功效终点(SPRID8),FDC布洛芬400 mg /对乙酰氨基酚1000 mg的疗效明显高于布洛芬400 mg(P = 0.02)和对乙酰氨基酚

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号