首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of nicotine preparations in active ulcerative colitis.
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of nicotine preparations in active ulcerative colitis.

机译:尼古丁制剂在活动性溃疡性结肠炎中的疗效和耐受性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Findings from clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of nicotine preparations in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis (UC) have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of nicotine preparations in inducing remission in UC. METHODS: A literature search (1966 August 2010) of Scopus (EMBASE), PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for clinical trials that investigated the efficacy and/or tolerability (any adverse events [AEs] and withdrawals due to AEs) of any nicotine preparation for the induction of remission in UC. RESULTS: The electronic searches yielded 788 items. Of these, 3 placebo-controlled trials representing 233 patients with UC and 2 randomized controlled trials that compared nicotine to corticosteroids in 81 patients with UC were included in meta-analysis. The summary relative risks (RRs) (95% CI) in comparing nicotine to placebo were 1.40 (0.63-3.12) (P = NS) for clinical remission, 1.95 (1.38-2.78) (P < 0.001) for AEs, and 3.44 (0.71-16.71) (P = NS) for withdrawal due to AEs. The summary RRs in comparing nicotine to corticosteroids (prednisolone/prednisone) were 0.74 (0.5-1.09) (P = NS) for clinical remission in 2 trials and 2.28 (0.76-6.83) (P = NS) for withdrawal due to AEs. CONCLUSION: The findings from this meta-analysis do not support the efficacy or tolerability of nicotine preparations in inducing remission in UC.
机译:背景:关于尼古丁制剂维持溃疡性结肠炎(UC)缓解的疗效和耐受性的临床研究发现不一致。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估烟碱制剂在诱导UC缓解中的功效和耐受性。方法:对Scopus(EMBASE),PubMed,Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册进行了文献检索(1966年2010年),以研究临床疗效和/或耐受性(任何不良事件[AEs])以及因AE引起的停药),以诱导UC缓解的任何尼古丁制剂。结果:电子搜索产生了788个项目。在荟萃分析中,包括3项安慰剂对照试验(代表233例UC患者)和2项随机对照试验,对81例UC患者中的尼古丁与皮质类固醇进行比较。尼古丁与安慰剂比较的临床风险的相对危险度(RRs)(95%CI)为1.40(0.63-3.12)(P = NS),AEs为1.95(1.38-2.78)(P <0.001)和3.44( 0.71-16.71)(P = NS)归因于AE。在2项试验中,尼古丁与皮质类固醇(泼尼松龙/泼尼松)比较的总RR为0.74(0.5-1.09)(P = NS),而因AE停药则为2.28(0.76-6.83)(P = NS)。结论:这项荟萃分析的结果不支持尼古丁制剂诱导UC缓解的疗效或耐受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号