...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of drugs in dermatology: JDD >Efficacy and tolerability of two commercial hyperpigmentation kits in the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation and photo-aging
【24h】

Efficacy and tolerability of two commercial hyperpigmentation kits in the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation and photo-aging

机译:两种市售色素沉着试剂盒在面部色素沉着和光老化治疗中的功效和耐受性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Hyperpigmentary disorders are common aesthetic skin conditions that can be very concerning to patients and both challenging and time-consuming for the physician to treat. Several companies commercialize hyperpigmentation kits for the lightening of dark spots and improvement of overall skin dyschromia. Unfortunately, clinical data from controlled studies to support the efficacy and tolerability of these kits are typically lacking Objective: This investigator-blinded, randomized trial was undertaken to compare two commercial hyperpigmentation systems (kits) used for the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation and photo-aging. Methods: Female subjects with at least mild facial hyperpigmentation and photo-aging were randomized to treatment with either the four product SkinMedica (SKM) regimen or the 7-product Obagi (OMP) regimen. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Subjects were evaluated by the blinded investigator for clinical efficacy and tolerability using grading scales. Standardized digital photographs were taken at baseline and week 12. Self-assessment questionnaires were completed at week 12. Thirty-five females (SKM=17, OMP=18) completed the 12-week study. Results: Both treatment regimens showed a significant improvement at week 12 (compared to baseline) for Overall Hyperpigmentation, Global Photo-aging and Sallowness. At week 12, there was no significant difference between treatment groups in Global Response to Treatment. Tolerability was good for both regimens based on investigator assessments. Subject self-assessments showed no consistent differences in efficacy between the two regimens. Similarly, there was no significant difference in subject satisfaction or intent to continue use between the two regimens. Conclusion: This clinical study demonstrated that both systems were equally effective at reducing hyperpigmentation and global photoaging in females with mottled pigmentation and photodamaged facial skin.
机译:背景:色素沉着过度症是常见的审美皮肤病,可能与患者密切相关,对医生而言既具有挑战性又耗时。几家公司将色素沉着过度试剂盒商业化,以减轻黑斑和改善整体皮肤色差。不幸的是,通常缺乏对照研究来支持这些试剂盒的功效和耐受性的临床数据。目的:进行这项研究者盲目的随机试验,以比较两种用于治疗面部色素沉着和光老化的商业性色素沉着系统(套件)。 。方法:将至少具有轻度面部色素沉着过度和光老化的女性受试者随机分为四种产品SkinMedica(SKM)方案或7种产品Obagi(OMP)方案治疗。在基线,第4、8和12周进行评估。盲人研究者使用分级量表对受试者的临床疗效和耐受性进行评估。在基线和第12周拍摄了标准化的数字照片。在第12周完成了自我评估问卷。35名女性(SKM = 17,OMP = 18)完成了为期12周的研究。结果:两种治疗方案在第12周(与基线相比)均显示出整体色素沉着,总体光老化和淡淡度的显着改善。在第12周时,各治疗组之间的总体治疗反应无​​显着差异。根据研究者的评估,两种方案的耐受性均良好。受试者的自我评估显示两种方案在疗效上没有一致的差异。同样,两种治疗方案的受试者满意度或继续使用的意愿也没有显着差异。结论:这项临床研究表明,这两种系统在减少斑驳的色素沉着和面部皮肤光损伤的女性中,均能有效减少色素沉着过度和整体光老化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号