...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >The Myth of Asian Exceptionalism: Response to Bomhoff and Gu
【24h】

The Myth of Asian Exceptionalism: Response to Bomhoff and Gu

机译:亚洲例外主义的神话:对Bomhoff和Gu的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In a series of contributions, Welzel describes modernization as human empowerment: a process that emancipates people from external authority. Human empowerment theory (HET) posits two sequential mechanisms. First, cognitive empowerment through rising levels of education and knowledge leads to motivational empowerment, manifest in rising emancipative values. Second, rising emancipative values nurture mass aspirations for liberal democracy, leading to more effective democratic practices. Using World Values Survey (WVS) data from a dozen Asian societies, Bomhoff and Gu claim that Asia is different because these mechanisms do not work among Asian societies. Against these claims, this response shows that Bomhoff and Gu's results are inconclusive. Upon proper examination of WVS evidence, their conclusions turn actually into the opposite: The emancipative logic of HET applies to Asia as much as it applies to the "West."
机译:韦尔泽尔(Welzel)在一系列贡献中将现代化描述为人类赋权:这一过程使人们摆脱了外部权威。人类赋权理论(HET)提出了两个顺序机制。首先,通过提高教育水平和知识水平来增强认知能力会导致激励能力,这一点体现在解放的价值观中。第二,解放的价值观的上升激发了人们对自由民主的渴望,从而导致了更有效的民主实践。 Bomhoff和Gu使用来自十几个亚洲社会的世界价值调查(WVS)数据,声称亚洲与众不同,因为这些机制在亚洲社会中不起作用。针对这些说法,此回应表明Bomhoff和Gu的结果尚无定论。经过对WVS证据的正确审查,他们的结论实际上是相反的:HET的解放逻辑既适用于亚洲,也适用于“西方”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号