首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede's Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey
【24h】

Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede's Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey

机译:个人水平和国家水平的价值结构是否不同?用Schwartz价值调查测试Hofstede的遗产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hofstede identified four value dimensions at the country level but did not find matchingdimensions at the individual level. Schwartz discriminated different sets of value constructs atindividual and country-levels, based on separate analyses per level. In this article, the authorsdirectly examine the degree of similarity or isomorphism between the structure of values inindividual- and country-level analyses, using multidimensional scaling followed by generalizedProcrustes analysis. Using data from the Schwartz Value Survey from 53 and 66 countries, theauthors find substantial similarity in structure across levels, but indices fall somewhat short ofstructural isomorphism.The authors then test hypotheses regarding possible causes of the lessthan perfect isomorphism between the levels. Number of countries (sample size at countrylevel) and structural shifts in individual items account for some of the lack of isomorphism.Implications for future cross-cultural research are discussed.
机译:霍夫斯泰德(Hofstede)在国家/地区级别确定了四个价值维度,但未在个人级别上找到匹配的维度。 Schwartz基于每个级别的独立分析,区分了个人和国家级别的不同价值构造集。在本文中,作者使用多维标度和广义Procrustes分析直接检查了个人和国家/地区分析中值结构之间的相似性或同构程度。使用来自53个国家和66个国家的Schwartz价值调查的数据,作者发现各个级别的结构具有实质性相似性,但指标在结构同构性上有些欠缺。然后作者测试了有关两个级别之间不够完美同构的可能原因的假设。国家数量(国家一级的样本数量)和单个项目的结构转移是造成同构缺乏的原因之一。本文讨论了对未来跨文化研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号