...
【24h】

Directed Acyclic Graphs for Oral Disease Research

机译:口腔疾病研究的有向无环图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are nonparametric graphical tools used to depict causal relations in the epidemiologic assessment of exposure-outcome associations. Although their use in dental research was first advocated in 2002, DAGs have yet to be widely adopted in this field. DAGs help identify threats to causal inference such as confounders, bias due to subject selection, and inappropriate handling of missing data. DAGs can also inform the data analysis strategy based on relations among variables depicted on it. This article uses the example of a study of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), investigating causal effects of facial injury on subsequent risk of TMD. We illustrate how DAGs can be used to identify 1) potential confounders, 2) mediators and the consequences of attempt to estimate direct causal effects, 3) colliders and the consequences of conditioning on colliders, and 4) variables that are simultaneously mediators and confounders and the consequences of adjustment for such variables. For example, one DAG shows that statistical adjustment for the pressure pain threshold would necessarily bias the causal relation between facial injury and TMD. Finally, we discuss the usefulness of DAGs during study design, subject selection, and choosing variables to be measured in a study.
机译:有向无环图(DAG)是非参数图形工具,用于描述暴露结果关联的流行病学评估中的因果关系。尽管2002年首次提倡将其用于牙科研究,但DAG在该领域尚未得到广泛采用。 DAG有助于确定因果推理的威胁,例如混杂因素,由于主题选择而引起的偏见以及对丢失数据的不适当处理。 DAG还可以根据其上描述的变量之间的关系为数据分析策略提供信息。本文以颞下颌疾病(TMD)研究为例,研究面部损伤对TMD后续风险的因果关系。我们说明了如何使用DAG来识别1)潜在的混杂因素,2)中介者以及尝试估算直接因果效应的后果,3)碰撞者和条件对撞者的后果,以及4)同时充当中介者和混杂者的变量,以及调整此类变量的后果。例如,一个DAG显示,对压力疼痛阈值的统计调整必然会使面部损伤与TMD之间的因果关系产生偏差。最后,我们讨论了DAG在研究设计,主题选择以及选择要在研究中测量的变量期间的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号