...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Efficiency of test report delivery to the requesting physician in an outpatient setting: an observational study.
【24h】

Efficiency of test report delivery to the requesting physician in an outpatient setting: an observational study.

机译:在门诊环境中将测试报告传送给请求医生的效率:一项观察性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories accredited according to ISO 15189 quality standards are obliged to implement and continuously monitor quality indicators for evaluation of the laboratory's contribution to patient care. Reporting laboratory results to the requesting physician is one important phase of the clinical laboratory testing process. Failure to report results may indicate the ineffectiveness of the laboratory service. We aimed to analyze the proportion and type of laboratory reports for outpatients that were not delivered to the requesting physician. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted during an 11-month period from January to December 2007 at our outpatient biochemistry laboratory unit. Data on demographic characteristics, request types and laboratory findings for all uncollected reports were retrieved from the laboratory information system and compared with one random 2-week representative period. RESULTS: During the study period our laboratory issued 22,445 patient reports with more than 150,000 biochemistry analyses. Of these, 464 (2.1%) were uncollected laboratory reports. When compared to the representative period, patients who never collected their laboratory reports were younger (p<0.001) or suffering from some chronic disease. Routine biochemistry tests were the most prevalent (>50%). The majority of routine biochemistry tests were almost equally represented during the study and representative period, while molecular diagnostic tests were several times more frequently uncollected (p<0.001). Reports with electrolytes, metabolites and glucose were the least likely to be uncollected (p<0.001). The total cost for those tests was 30% of the average monthly laboratory budget. CONCLUSIONS: A significant amount of the laboratory budget is wasted for tests that never reach the requesting physician. Such misutilization of the laboratory reveals the substantial lack of medical necessity for test requests. Further studies are needed to explore the possible efficiency of the various interventions in reducing the volume of unnecessary and erroneous testing.
机译:背景:根据ISO 15189质量标准认可的临床实验室有义务实施和持续监控质量指标,以评估实验室对患者护理的贡献。向要求的医生报告实验室结果是临床实验室测试过程的重要阶段。不报告结果可能表明实验室服务无效。我们旨在分析未交付给请求医师的门诊患者实验室报告的比例和类型。方法:这项回顾性观察研究是在2007年1月至2007年12月的11个月内于我们的门诊生化实验室进行的。从实验室信息系统中检索所有未收集报告的人口统计学特征,请求类型和实验室发现的数据,并将其与一个随机的2周代表期进行比较。结果:在研究期间,我们的实验室发布了22,445例患者报告,并进行了150,000多次生化分析。其中,有464份(2.1%)未收集的实验室报告。与代表期相比,从未收集实验室报告的患者更年轻(p <0.001)或患有某些慢性疾病。常规生化检查最为普遍(> 50%)。在研究和代表时期,大多数常规生化测试几乎相等,而分子诊断测试的未采集频率则高出几倍(p <0.001)。关于电解质,代谢产物和葡萄糖的报告被收集的可能性最小(p <0.001)。这些测试的总费用为平均每月实验室预算的30%。结论:大量的实验室预算被浪费在从来没有达到要求医师的测试上。实验室的这种不当使用表明,对测试要求的医疗需求大大缺乏。需要进行进一步的研究以探索各种干预措施在减少不必要和错误测试数量方面的可能效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号