...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: CCLM >Discordant total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays: does calibration with WHO reference materials diminish the problem?
【24h】

Discordant total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays: does calibration with WHO reference materials diminish the problem?

机译:总前列腺游离抗原和游离前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测不一致:使用WHO参考材料进行校准是否可以减少问题?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay-dependent variations could result in misinterpretation of individual PSA values. Therefore, the situation for clinical interpretation of PSA or percent free PSA (%fPSA) results is complicated. This review summarizes the differences in various total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) assays, and results obtained using the new World Health Organization (WHO) calibrated Access assays from various studies. Method comparisons between the traditionally calibrated Hybritech PSA and fPSA assays and the new "standardized" WHO calibrated assays yield results that are approximately 25% lower for PSA and fPSA. A PSA cut-off of 3 or 3.1 microg/L should be considered for WHO calibrated assays in order to achieve the same sensitivity/specificity profile as with a cut-off of 4 microg/L in traditionally calibrated assays. The %fPSA cut-offs could be retained.
机译:前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)分析相关的变异可能会导致对单个PSA值的误解。因此,临床解释PSA或游离PSA百分比(%fPSA)结果的情况非常复杂。这篇综述总结了各种总PSA(tPSA)和免费PSA(fPSA)检测方法的差异,以及使用各种研究通过新的世界卫生组织(WHO)校准的Access检测方法获得的结果。传统校准的Hybritech PSA和fPSA测定与新的“标准化” WHO校准测定之间的方法比较得出PSA和fPSA的测定结果降低了约25%。对于WHO校准的测定,应考虑PSA阈值为3或3.1 microg / L,以达到与传统校准的PSA阈值为4 microg / L相同的敏感性/特异性。 %fPSA临界值可以保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号