...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique.
【24h】

Development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Delphi technique.

机译:使用Delphi技术开发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床定义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to describe the implementation of formal consensus techniques in the development of a clinical definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Delphi consensus process was conducted using e-mail. Sixteen panelists who were both researchers and opinion leaders were systematically recruited. The Delphi technique was performed over 4 rounds on the background of an explicit definition framework. Item generation was performed in round 1, item reduction in rounds 2 and 3, and definition evaluation in round 4. Explicit consensus thresholds were used throughout. RESULTS: Of the 16 panelists, 11 actually participated in developing a definition that met a priori consensus rules on the third iteration. New incorporations in the Delphi definition include the use of a standardized oxygenation assessment and the documentation of either a predisposing factor or decreased thoracic compliance. The panelists rated the Delphi definition as acceptable tohighly acceptable (median score, 6; range, 5-7 on a 7-point Likert scale). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it is feasible to consider using formal consensus in the development of future definitions of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Testing of sensibility, reliability, and validity are needed for this preliminary definition; these test results should be incorporated into future iterations of this definition.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是描述在开发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床定义中正式共识技术的实施。材料与方法:使用电子邮件进行了Delphi共识过程。系统地招募了既是研究人员又是意见领袖的16名小组成员。在显式定义框架的背景下,Delphi技术进行了四轮。在第1轮进行项目生成,在第2轮和第3轮进行项目缩减,在第4轮进行定义评估。在整个过程中使用明确的共识阈值。结果:在16名小组成员中,有11名实际上参与了定义的定义,该定义在第三次迭代中符合先验共识规则。 Delphi定义中新加入的公司包括使用标准化的氧合评估以及诱发因素或降低的胸腔顺应性的文档。小组成员将德尔福的定义评为可接受至高度可接受(中位数得分为6;范围为7-7点李克特量表的得分为5-7)。结论:我们得出结论,在制定急性呼吸窘迫综合征的未来定义时考虑使用正式共识是可行的。此初步定义需要测试敏感性,可靠性和有效性。这些测试结果应纳入此定义的将来迭代中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号