...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Impact of patient position on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
【24h】

Impact of patient position on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机译:患者位置对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to summarize the effect of position (prone and semirecumbent 45 degrees ) of mechanically ventilated patients on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search for randomized control trials (RCTs) was done. We estimated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed effects model or random effects model, where appropriate. For continuous variables, we calculated the estimation of weighted mean differences. RESULTS: We analyzed data extracted from 3 RCTs studying the semirecumbent 45 degrees and 4 RCTs studying the prone position with a total of 337 and 1018 patients, respectively. The odds of developing clinically diagnosed VAP were significantly lower among patients in the semirecumbent 45 degrees position compared to patients in the supine position (OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.82; 337 patients). The comparison of prone vs supine position group showed a moderate trend toward better outcomes regarding the incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP among patients in the prone position (OR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60-1.08; 1018 patients). The subanalysis regarding the incidence of microbiologically documented VAP, the length of intensive care unit stay, and the duration of mechanical ventilation showed that patients in the semirecumbent 45 degrees position have a moderate trend toward better clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides additional evidence that the usual practice of back-rest elevation of 15 degrees to 30 degrees is not sufficient to prevent VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. Patients positioned semirecumbently 45 degrees have significantly lower incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP compared to patients positioned supinely. On the other hand, the incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP among patients positioned pronely does not differ significantly from the incidence of clinically diagnosed VAP among patients positioned supinely.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是总结机械通气患者的位置(俯卧和半卧位45度)对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率和其他结局的影响。方法:对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统搜索。我们在适当的情况下使用固定效应模型或随机效应模型估算了合并的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。对于连续变量,我们计算了加权均数差的估计值。结果:我们分析了从研究半卧位45度的3个RCT和研究俯卧位的4个RCT分别提取的数据,共337例和1018例患者。与仰卧位患者相比,半卧位45度位患者发生临床诊断的VAP的几率明显更低(OR = 0.47; 95%CI为0.27-0.82; 337位患者)。俯卧位与仰卧位组的比较显示,在俯卧位患者中,临床诊断出的VAP发生率呈中等程度的趋于好转的趋势(OR = 0.80; 95%CI,0.60-1.08; 1018名患者)。关于微生物学记录的VAP的发生率,重症监护病房住院时间的长短以及机械通气时间的亚分析显示,半卧位45度位置的患者有较好的临床预后趋势。结论:这项荟萃分析提供了更多证据,证明通常将靠背抬高15度至30度不足以预防机械通气患者的VAP。与仰卧位患者相比,半卧位45度的患者临床诊断的VAP发生率显着降低。另一方面,俯卧位患者中临床诊断的VAP的发生率与仰卧位患者中临床诊断的VAP的发生率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号