首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Evaluation of solid-phase extraction and stir-bar sorptive extraction for the determination of fungicide residues at low-mu g kg(-1) levels in grapes by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
【24h】

Evaluation of solid-phase extraction and stir-bar sorptive extraction for the determination of fungicide residues at low-mu g kg(-1) levels in grapes by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

机译:固相萃取和搅拌棒吸附萃取评价液相色谱-质谱法测定葡萄中低μgkg(-1)残留量的杀菌剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method has been developed for determining bitertanol, carboxin, flutriafol, pyrimethanil, tebuconazole and triadimefon. The evaluation of both atmospheric pressure interfaces (API), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and electrospray (ESI) using positive and negative ionization modes, clearly shows that the studied pesticides are more sensitive using APCI in positive mode. Two procedures based on solid-phase extraction (SPE) and stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) have been assessed for extracting these compounds in grape. The recoveries obtained by SPE in samples spiked at the limit of quantification (LOQ) level ranged from 60 to 100% with relative standard deviation (R.S.D.s) from 7 to 17%. With the SBSE the recoveries obtained from samples spiked at LOQ level were between 15 and 100% and the R.S.D.s between 10 and 19%. The LOQs of most compounds are better by SPE (0.003-0.01 mg kg(-1)) than by SBSE (0.01 mg kg(-1) for all fungicides). Although SPE provided higher recoveries, lower R.S.D.s, best LOQs and is more rapid to carry out compared with SBSE, this last one has some advantages such as lower organic solvent consumption, and cleaner extracts. Results obtained applying both techniques to real samples are analogous. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:已经开发了一种液相色谱-质谱联用方法,用于测定比色林,羧甲基,氟曲酸,嘧啶酮,戊唑醇和三唑酮。使用正电离和负电离模式对大气压界面(API),大气压化学电离(APCI)和电喷雾(ESI)进行评估,清楚地表明,所研究的农药在正模式下使用APCI更加敏感。已经评估了两种基于固相萃取(SPE)和搅拌棒吸附萃取(SBSE)的方法来萃取葡萄中的这些化合物。在定量限(LOQ)浓度加标的样品中,SPE的回收率范围为60%至100%,相对标准偏差(R.S.D.s)为7%至17%。使用SBSE时,从以LOQ水平加标的样品获得的回收率在15%至100%之间,R.S.D.s在10%至19%之间。 SPE(0.003-0.01 mg kg(-1))比SBSE(所有杀真菌剂0.01 mg kg(-1))多数化合物的LOQ更好。尽管SPE与SBSE相比具有更高的回收率,更低的R.S.D.s,最佳的LOQ和更快的执行速度,但后一种具有一些优势,例如有机溶剂消耗更少,提取物更清洁。将两种技术应用于真实样品所获得的结果是相似的。 (C)2004 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号