...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Evaluation of supercritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and sonication in the determination of some phenolic compounds from various soil matrices
【24h】

Evaluation of supercritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and sonication in the determination of some phenolic compounds from various soil matrices

机译:评价超临界流体萃取,微波辅助萃取和超声处理各种土壤基质中某些酚类化合物的测定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Extraction methods using supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and microwave-assisted process (MAP) techniques, with or without a one-step in sity derivatisation, were evaluated for the extraction of phenol, o-cresol, m-cresol and p-cresol from soils.Five artificially spiked soil matrices were prepared; three of them were prepared by adding various amounts of activated charcoal in order to increase the degree of analyte-matrix interaction. We also applied the methods to a real phenol contaminated soil with a high carbon content (18% ). To provide a basis for comparison, all the soils were extracted using an US Environmental Protection Agency-approved sonication protocol. The extracts obtained were analyv.ed on a GC-MS system without any preliminaryclean-up or concentration steps. The results showed that SFE and MAP are more efficient than sonication with at least twice the recovery in all the soils tested. MAP and MAP-derivatisation showed the best recoveries (>80%) for the five spiked matrices studied with the exception of o-cresol in soils with activated charcoal content higher than 5%. In these specific soils, SFE showed very low recoveries tor the four phenols. However, recoveries were significantly improved when a derivatisation step was combined to SFE. In the real soil tested, the recoveries using derivatisation-extraction process were lower than the recoveries using extraction process. In general, derivatisation-extractions perform better and do not require extreme extraction conditions.
机译:评估了采用超临界流体萃取(SFE)和微波辅助工艺(MAP)技术的萃取方法,无论是否进行一步衍生,都可以从中萃取苯酚,邻甲酚,间甲酚和对甲酚。制备了五个人工加标的土壤基质;为了增加分析物与基质的相互作用程度,通过添加各种量的活性炭制备了其中的三种。我们还将这些方法应用于碳含量高(18%)的真实苯酚污染的土壤。为了提供比较的基础,所有土壤均使用美国环境保护署批准的超声处理方案进行了提取。无需任何初步纯化或浓缩步骤即可在GC-MS系统上对获得的提取物进行分析。结果表明,SFE和MAP比超声处理更有效,在所有测试土壤中的回收率至少是其两倍。 MAP和MAP衍生化研究了五个加标基质的最佳回收率(> 80%),但活性炭含量高于5%的土壤中的邻甲酚除外。在这些特定的土壤中,SFE对四种酚的回收率非常低。但是,将衍生化步骤与SFE结合使用时,回收率显着提高。在测试的真实土壤中,使用衍生化-提取过程的回收率低于使用提取过程的回收率。通常,衍生化提取性能更好,不需要极端的提取条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号