...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Determination of acidic pharmaceuticals and potential endocrine, disrupting compounds in wastewaters and spring waters by selective elution and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
【24h】

Determination of acidic pharmaceuticals and potential endocrine, disrupting compounds in wastewaters and spring waters by selective elution and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

机译:通过选择性洗脱和气相色谱-质谱法分析测定酸性药物和潜在的内分泌,废水和泉水中的破坏性化合物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the trend in development of analytical methods for emerging contaminants is towards reduced sample preparation and increased detector selectivity, there are still benefits from removal of matrix material during sample preparation. This paper describes a simple method for acidic pharmaceuticals and a range of potential endocrine disrupting compounds in untreated wastewaters and spring waters. It is based on separation of the two classes during elution from the extraction cartridge with final analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. 3,4-D was used as the recovery standard for the acids while 4-n-nonylphenol and [H-2(4)]estrone were used for the endocrine disrupters; mean recoveries varied between 89% and 111%. The method was also extensively validated by fortification with the target compounds. Recoveries of acids were from 68% to 97% with relative standard deviations generally less than 10% and recoveries of endocrine disrupters were 68-109% with relative standard deviations less than 20%. Detection limits varied from 0.005 to 1 ng/L in spring water, and from 0.5 to 100 ng/L in untreated wastewater. Concentrations of the analytes in the wastewater ranged from 0.018 to 22.4 mu g/L. Values were comparable to reported data, although concentrations were generally relatively high, probably because of a lack of treatment. Triclosan, phthalates, estrone, 17 beta-estradiol, ibuprofen, and naproxen were present in the spring water from aquifers recharged indirectly with this wastewater after its use for irrigation; concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 25.0 ng/L. The much lower concentrations compared to wastewater indicate effective removal processes on passage through the soil and subsoil. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管针对新兴污染物的分析方法的发展趋势是朝着减少样品制备和增加检测器选择性的方向发展,但是在样品制备过程中去除基质材料仍然有好处。本文介绍了一种酸性药物的简单方法以及未经处理的废水和泉水中一系列潜在的内分泌干扰化合物。它基于从萃取柱上洗脱期间分离出的两类物质,并通过气相色谱-质谱法进行最终分析。 3,4-D用作酸的回收标准,而4-正壬基苯酚和[H-2(4)]雌酮用作内分泌干扰物。平均回收率在89%和111%之间。该方法还通过目标化合物的强化得到了广泛验证。酸的回收率为68%至97%,相对标准偏差通常小于10%,内分泌干扰物的回收率为68-109%,相对标准偏差小于20%。检出限在泉水中为0.005 ng / L至1 ng / L,在未经处理的废水中为0.5至100 ng / L。废水中分析物的浓度范围为0.018至22.4μg / L。尽管浓度通常较高,但数值可能与报道的数据相当,这可能是由于缺乏治疗所致。废水中的三氯生,邻苯二甲酸酯,雌酮,17β-雌二醇,布洛芬和萘普生存在于泉水中,这些泉水在灌溉后间接补充了这些含水层;浓度范围为0.01至25.0 ng / L。与废水相比,低得多的浓度表明在通过土壤和地下土壤时有效的去除过程。 (c)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号