...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chromatographic Science >Comparison of Two Extraction Methods for the Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Surface Soils Using Headspace SPME with GC-F1D
【24h】

Comparison of Two Extraction Methods for the Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Surface Soils Using Headspace SPME with GC-F1D

机译:顶空SPME与GC-F1D两种方法测定表层土壤中多环芳烃的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two simple methods using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to a gas chromatograph with a flame ionization detector were compared for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in soils. These compounds were included in the US Environmental Protection Agency's Priority Pollutants list. Direct hot water HS-SPME extraction and sonication organic extraction followed by HS-SPME were optimized using experimental designs. The first method was chosen for PAH determination. The validation of the proposed method was carried out by analyzing PAHs in the certified soil reference material RTC-CRM 123. The accuracy obtained for the PAHs was shown to be inside the prediction interval with the certified material. The optimized method was applied to the analysis of several superficial soils from Gipuzkoa (Basque Country, North Spain).
机译:比较了使用顶空固相微萃取(HS-SPME)结合带有火焰离子化检测器的气相色谱仪的两种简单方法,用于测定土壤中的多环芳烃(PAH)。这些化合物已包括在美国环境保护局的“优先污染物”列表中。使用实验设计优化了直接热水HS-SPME萃取和超声有机萃取,然后进行HS-SPME的优化。选择第一种方法进行PAH测定。通过分析认证的土壤参考材料RTC-CRM 123中的PAH来进行所提出方法的验证。对于PAH所获得的准确度显示在认证材料的预测区间内。该优化方法用于分析吉普斯夸(Gipuzkoa)(西班牙北部巴斯克地区)的几种表层土壤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号