首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Differentiation of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps 1 cm or bigger with multi-detector row computed tomography.
【24h】

Differentiation of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps 1 cm or bigger with multi-detector row computed tomography.

机译:用多排行计算机断层扫描技术区分1 cm或更大的非肿瘤性和肿瘤性胆囊息肉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate useful computed tomographic features to differentiate nonneoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder polyps 1 cm or bigger. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with 32 nonneoplastic polyps and 67 patients with 73 neoplastic polyps 1 cm or bigger underwent unenhanced and dual-phase (arterial and portal venous phases) multi-detector row computed tomography. Gallbladder polyps were diagnosed by cholecystectomy. Computed tomographic features including size (1.5 cm), surface (smooth or irregular), shape (pedunculated or sessile), accompanying wall thickening, basal indentation, perception on unenhanced images, and enhancement pattern between 2 groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, age 55 years or older (P = 0.0019), size bigger than 1.5 cm (P < 0.0001), irregular surface (P = 0.0033), sessile shape (P = 0.0016), accompanying wall thickening (P = 0.0056), basal indentation (P = 0.0236), and perception on unenhanced images (P < 0.0001) were significantly more frequent in neoplastic polyps as compared with nonneoplastic polyps. On multivariate analysis, size bigger than 1.5 cm (P = 0.0260), sessile shape (P = 0.0397), and perception on unenhanced images (P < 0.0001) were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Size bigger than 1.5 cm, sessile shape, and perception on unenhanced images are the main factors that differentiate neoplastic from nonneoplastic gallbladder polyps 1 cm or bigger.
机译:目的:评估有用的计算机断层扫描特征,以区分1 cm或更大的非肿瘤性和肿瘤性胆囊息肉。方法:31例32例非肿瘤性息肉患者和67例73例1 cm或更大的肿瘤性息肉患者接受了未增强和双相(动脉和门静脉期)多排计算机断层扫描。通过胆囊切除术诊断胆囊息肉。比较了两组的计算机断层扫描特征,包括尺寸(≤1.5或> 1.5厘米),表面(光滑或不规则),形状(有蒂或无梗),伴随的壁增厚,基底凹痕,未增强图像的感知以及两组之间的增强模式使用单变量和多变量分析。结果:单因素分析显示,年龄大于或等于55岁(P = 0.0019),尺寸大于1.5厘米(P <0.0001),表面不规则(P = 0.0033),无柄形状(P = 0.0016),伴有壁增厚(P =与非肿瘤性息肉相比,肿瘤性息肉的发病率显着更高(0.0056),基底压痕(P = 0.0236)和对未增强图像的感知(P <0.0001)。在多变量分析中,尺寸大于1.5厘米(P = 0.0260),无柄形状(P = 0.0397)和未增强图像上的感知(P <0.0001)具有统计学意义。结论:大于1.5厘米的大小,无梗的形状和对未增强图像的感知力是将赘生性肿瘤与1cm或更大的非肿瘤性胆囊息肉区分开的主要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号