...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >Anesthetic and recovery profiles of lidocaine versus mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic arthroscopic procedures
【24h】

Anesthetic and recovery profiles of lidocaine versus mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic arthroscopic procedures

机译:利多卡因与甲哌卡因对门诊骨科关节镜手术患者进行脊髓麻醉的麻醉和恢复情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Objective: To compare isobaric lidocaine and mepivacaine in outpatient arthroscopic surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Setting: Ambulatory surgery center affiliated with an academic tertiary-care hospital. Patients: 84 adult, ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 ambulatory patients, age 18-70 years, undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive a combination spinal-epidural anesthetic using 80 mg of either isobaric 2% mepivacaine or isobaric 2% lidocaine. Patients also received a femoral 3-in-1 block with 0.5% bupivacaine applied to the affected extremity. Measurements: Demographic data and level and duration of the block were recorded. The use of supplemental epidural anesthesia was noted along with frequency of bradycardia, hypotension, and episodes of nausea and vomiting. Duration of block and times to ambulation and voiding were recorded. Delayed variables, including fatigue, difficulty urinating, back pain, and transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) were obtained. Main Results: No demographic differences were noted between groups, and surgical duration was similar. Satisfactory anesthesia was achieved in all cases, with no differences noted in hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting. Onset of sensory and motor block was similar. Duration of block before epidural supplementation was 94 ± 21 minutes with lidocaine versus 122 ± 23 minutes for mepivacaine (P < 0.011). Times to ambulation and voiding were longer in patients receiving mepivacaine but did not affect PACU stay. Twenty-four and 48-hour recovery was similar with no TNS symptoms reported. Conclusion: No major differences were noted between lidocaine and mepivacaine spinal anesthesia. Time to ambulation and voiding were longer in patients who received mepivacaine as was time to first dose of epidural catheter. Neither group had TNS symptoms. Lidocaine and mepivacaine are both appropriate spinal anesthetics for ambulatory orthopedic lower extremity procedures.
机译:研究目的:比较门诊关节镜手术中同量异位利多卡因和甲哌卡因。设计:前瞻性,随机,双盲研究。地点:附属于学术三级医院的门诊手术中心。患者:84名成人,ASA身体状况1、2和3名非卧床患者,年龄在18-70岁,接受关节镜膝关节手术。干预措施:将患者随机接受80 mg的同量异位2%哌拉卡因或同量异位2%利多卡因进行的硬膜外麻醉。患者还接受了股骨头3合1阻滞,对患肢应用0.5%布比卡因。测量:记录人口统计数据以及街区的水平和持续时间。注意到硬膜外辅助麻醉的使用以及心动过缓,低血压以及恶心和呕吐的发作频率。记录阻塞的持续时间以及移动和排尿的时间。获得延迟变量,包括疲劳,排尿困难,背痛和短暂性神经系统症状(TNS)。主要结果:两组之间没有人口统计学差异,手术时间相似。在所有情况下,麻醉效果均令人满意,低血压,心动过缓,恶心或呕吐均无差异。感觉障碍和运动障碍的发作相似。利多卡因硬膜外补充剂之前阻滞的持续时间为94±21分钟,而哌哌卡因为122±23分钟(P <0.011)。接受甲哌卡因的患者下床活动和排尿的时间更长,但并不影响PACU的住院时间。 24小时和48小时的恢复相似,没有TNS症状的报道。结论:利多卡因和米哌卡因脊柱麻醉之间没有显着差异。接受甲哌卡因的患者中的下床活动和排尿时间较长,与首次使用硬膜外导管的时间相同。两组均无TNS症状。利多卡因和甲哌卡因都是动态骨科下肢手术的适当脊柱麻醉剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号