...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical apheresis. >Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients

机译:包括plerixafor在内的造血干细胞动员策略在多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者中的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization. J. Clin. Apheresis, 28:395-403, 2013.
机译:外周血干细胞(PBSC)是自体移植的优选造血干细胞来源。然而,使用化学疗法和/或粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对PBSC的动员失败约20%。将G-CSF与plerixafor结合使用可提高动员成功率。我们比较了以下方案的成本效益:在所有反应不充分的患者中,首次动员期间使用plerixafor“按需”(POD),第一次标准动员(SSP)失败后使用plerixafor进行动员,以及标准(没有plerixafor的再动员计划(SSNP)。建立了决策树模型,该模型填充了来自六个捷克中心(n = 93)的首例患者登记表中的数据,以便从付款人的角度比较临床收益和直接成本。 POD,SSP和SSNP动员的成功率和成本是; 94.9%,$ 7,197; 94.7%,$ 8,049;分别为84.7%,5,991美元。每位成功接受治疗的患者的直接费用分别为7,586美元,8,501美元和7,077美元。仅配备G-CSF的情况下,动员不良动员的成本为$ 5,808,如果加上plerixafor,则成本为$ 16,755。贫困动员小组中按需使用plerixafor的总费用为17,120美元。通常,plerixafor将动员成功率提高10%,并允许额外的患者成功动员,增加的费用为$ 11,803。如果“按需”使用,Plerixafor会比随后的动员更好,更便宜。 J.临床。 Apheresis,28:395-403,2013年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号