...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia.
【24h】

Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia.

机译:罗哌卡因,布比卡因和左旋布比卡因对硬膜外分娩镇痛的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesic efficacy and intensity of motor block with continuous infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor epidural analgesia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Labor and delivery suite at Magee Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA. PATIENTS: 162 ASA physical status I and II, full-term, primiparous women. INTERVENTIONS: All patients received epidural labor analgesia. Epidural medication consisted of an initial bolus of 8 mL local anesthetic with fentanyl (100 microg) followed by an infusion at 12 mL/h of local anesthetic with 2 microg/mL fentanyl. Patients were allocated to one of three groups, as follows: group 1 received bolus and infusion of bupivacaine 0.125%, group 2 received bolus and infusion of levobupivacaine 0.125%, and group 3 received a bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% and infusion of ropivacaine 0.1%. MEASUREMENTS: Maternal vital signs, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, sensory levels, and motor block (Bromage score) were recorded every hour. Duration of first and second stage of labor and mode of delivery were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in pain VAS or Bromage motor scores among the three groups of patients at any of the measured time intervals. The time to achieve T10 sensory level and patient comfort was shorter in the ropivacaine (9.35 +/- 4.96 min) and levobupivacaine (9.56 +/- 4.71 min) groups than the bupivacaine (11.89 +/- 7.76 min) group, although this difference did not reach a statistically significant level (P = 0.06). The second stage was significantly shorter in the bupivacaine group, lasting 81.27 +/- 63.3 min, compared with the ropivacaine group (121.69 +/- 86.5 min) and the levobupivacaine (115.5 +/- 83.6 minutes) group (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There are no significant differences in pain VAS and Bromage scores between 0.1% ropivacaine, 0.125% bupivacaine, and 0.1% levobupivacaine given for labor epidural analgesia.
机译:目的:比较连续输注罗哌卡因,布比卡因和左旋布比卡因联合芬太尼用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的镇痛效果和运动阻滞强度。设计:前瞻性,随机,双盲研究。地点:宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡马吉妇女医院的分娩室。患者:162 ASA身体状态I和II,足月初产妇女。干预:所有患者均接受硬膜外分娩镇痛。硬膜外用药包括先以8 mL局部麻醉药与芬太尼(100 microg)推注,然后以12 mL / h局部麻醉药输注2 microg / mL芬太尼。将患者分为三组之一,如下:第1组推注并输注布比卡因0.125%,第2组接受推注并输注左旋布比卡因0.125%,第3组接受罗哌卡因推注0.2%和罗哌卡因输注0.1% 。测量:每小时记录一次母亲生命体征,疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,感觉水平和运动阻滞(Bromage评分)。还记录了第一和第二产程的持续时间和分娩方式。结果:在任何测量的时间间隔,三组患者的疼痛VAS或Bromage运动评分均无统计学差异。罗哌卡因(9.35 +/- 4.96分钟)和左旋布比卡因(9.56 +/- 4.71分钟)组中达到T10感官水平和患者舒适度的时间比布比卡因(11.89 +/- 7.76分钟)组短,尽管这种差异没有达到统计学上的显着水平(P = 0.06)。与罗哌卡因组(121.69 +/- 86.5分钟)和左旋布比卡因(115.5 +/- 83.6分钟)组相比,布比卡因组的第二阶段显着缩短,持续81.27 +/- 63.3分钟(P = 0.04)。结论:硬膜外分娩镇痛的0.1%罗哌卡因,0.125%布比卡因和0.1%左旋布比卡因在疼痛VAS和Bromage评分上无显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号