首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical gastroenterology >Efficacy of preventive endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection.
【24h】

Efficacy of preventive endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal stricture after endoscopic resection.

机译:内镜下预防性内镜球囊扩张术对食管狭窄的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We earlier reported that mucosal defect involving over three-fourths of the circumference of the esophagus after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a risk factor for the development of the stricture. Although endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is a useful procedure to relieve the stricture, there is no standard strategy for preventing development of the stricture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of preventive EBD. METHODS: From 1993 to 2008, 41 consecutive patients with extensive mucosal defect involving over three-fourths of the esophageal circumference after EMR or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were investigated. Preventive EBD was carried out for 29 cases within 1 week just after EMR/ESD and was repeated once a week until the mucosal defect was completely healed. The remaining 12 cases were not underwent preventive EBD and used as a historic control. If postEMR/ESD stricture developed regardless of preventive EBD, conventional EBD was given repeatedly until the stricture was completely relieved. RESULTS: Preventive EBD decreased the incidence of stricture (59% vs. 92%, P =0.04), reduced the severity of stricture [(2 mm and 5 mm)=(1; 2; 14) vs. (4; 4; 3), P = 0.01] and shortened the duration required for resolving the stricture (29 d vs. 78 d, P =0.04) even when stricture developed. There was no complication associated with preventive EBD procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive EBD is an effective procedure to prevent postEMR/ESD stricture. Preventive EBD should be considered when EMR/ESD results in a mucosal defect with a circumference greater than three-fourths of the esophageal lumen.
机译:背景与目的:我们较早地报道,内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)后涉及食管周长四分之三的黏膜缺损是狭窄发展的危险因素。尽管内窥镜球囊扩张术(EBD)是缓解狭窄的有用方法,但尚无防止狭窄发展的标准策略。这项研究的目的是评估预防性EBD的疗效和安全性。方法:从1993年至2008年,对41例连续广泛粘膜缺损的患者进行了EMR或内镜下黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后,其食管周长超过四分之三。在EMR / ESD之后的1周内,对29例患者进行了预防性EBD,并每周重复一次,直到粘膜缺损完全治愈。其余12例未进行预防性EBD并用作历史对照。如果不管预防性EBD发生了EMR / ESD后狭窄,则重复使用常规EBD,直到完全缓解狭窄为止。结果:预防性EBD减少了狭窄的发生率(59%比92%,P = 0.04),减少了狭窄的严重程度[(= 2 mm;> 2 mm和 5 mm)= (1; 2; 14)vs.(4; 4; 3),P = 0.01],即使解决狭窄问题,也缩短了解决狭窄所需的时间(29 d vs. 78 d,P = 0.04)。预防性EBD手术没有并发症。结论:预防性EBD是预防EMR / ESD后狭窄的有效方法。当EMR / ESD导致粘膜缺损的周长大于食管腔的四分之三时,应考虑采用预防性EBD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号