...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology >The Efficacy of Guided Self-instruction for Patients With Idiopathic Chronic Fatigue: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

The Efficacy of Guided Self-instruction for Patients With Idiopathic Chronic Fatigue: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:指导性自我指导对特发性慢性疲劳患者的疗效:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for patients meeting U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for idiopathic chronic fatigue (ICF). ICF is thought to be a less severe disorder than chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The intervention consisted of a booklet with self-instructions combined with e-mail contact with a therapist. Method: Randomized controlled trial conducted at an outpatient facility. All patients suffered from severe and persistent fatigue with moderate impairment levels or fewer than 4 additional symptoms. Patients were randomly allocated to either guided self-instruction or a wait-list control group. Primary outcome measures were fatigue severity assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength and level of overall impairment assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile. Outcome measures were assessed prior to randomization and following treatment or wait-list control group. Results: One hundred patients were randomly allocated to the intervention or a wait-list control group and 95 completed second assessment. An intention-to-treat analysis showed significant treatment effects for fatigue severity (-8.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-13.99, -3.97], Cohen's d = 0.68, p < .001) and for overall impairment (-317.19, 95% CI [-481.70, -152.68], Cohen's d = 0.53, p < .01) in favor of the intervention. The number of additional symptoms and overall impairment at baseline did not moderate posttreatment fatigue severity. Baseline overall impairment moderated posttreatment impairment. Conclusions: Patients with ICF can be treated effectively with a minimal intervention. This is relevant as ICF is more prevalent than CFS and treatment capacity is limited.
机译:目的:确定认知行为干预对符合美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)特发性慢性疲劳(ICF)标准的患者的疗效。与慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)相比,ICF被认为不那么严重。干预包括一本带有自我指导的小册子,以及与治疗师的电子邮件联系。方法:在门诊机构进行的随机对照试验。所有患者均患有严重且持续的疲劳,伴有中等程度的损伤或少于4种其他症状。将患者随机分配至指导自我指导或等待名单对照组。主要的结局指标是通过检查清单的个人力量评估疲劳严重程度,并通过疾病影响概况评估整体损害水平。在随机分组之前,治疗后或等待名单对照组中评估结果指标。结果:100名患者被随机分配至干预组或等待名单对照组,其中95名完成了第二次评估。意向性治疗分析显示出对疲劳严重程度(-8.98,95%置信区间[CI] [-13.99,-3.97],Cohen d = 0.68,p <.001)和整体损伤(-317.19)的治疗效果,95%CI [-481.70,-152.68],科恩(Cohen)d = 0.53,p <.01)表示愿意采取干预措施。基线时其他症状的数量和总体损害并未缓解治疗后的疲劳严重程度。基线总体损害减轻了治疗后损害​​。结论:ICF患者可以通过最少的干预得到有效治疗。这一点很重要,因为ICF比CFS更普遍,并且治疗能力有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号