首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology >A randomized controlled trial comparing two vocational models for persons with severe mental illness
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial comparing two vocational models for persons with severe mental illness

机译:一项比较重度精神疾病患者两种职业模式的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors compared 2 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for individuals with severe mental illness: the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment and the diversified placement approach (DPA), which emphasizes work readiness and offers a range of vocational options, including agency-run businesses and agency-contracted placements with community employers. In all, 187 unemployed participants with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to IPS or DPA. Over 2 years, IPS had significantly better competitive employment outcomes than DPA. Competitive employment rates over the 2-year follow-up were 75.0% for IPS and 33.7% for DPA. However, IPS and DPA did not differ on paid employment outcomes. The authors conclude that IPS is more effective than DPA in achieving competitive employment, but not paid employment.
机译:作者比较了2种严重精神疾病患者的职业康复方法:受支持的就业的个人安置和支持(IPS)模式和强调工作准备并提供一系列职业选择的多元化安置方法(DPA),包括代理-与社区雇主一起经营企业和代理承包的安置。共有187名严重精神疾病的失业参与者被随机分配到IPS或DPA。在过去的两年中,与DPA相比,IPS的竞争性就业成果明显更好。在两年的随访中,IPS的竞争性就业率为75.0%,DPA的竞争性就业率为33.7%。但是,IPS和DPA在带薪就业结果方面没有差异。作者得出的结论是,在实现竞争性就业而不是有偿就业方面,IPS比DPA更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号