...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation.
【24h】

Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation.

机译:Scheimpflug角膜屈光度测量的准确性,用于人工晶状体屈光度计算。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of corneal power measurements by the Pentacam Scheimpflug system for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. SETTING: Studio Oculistico d'Azeglio, Bologna, Italy. METHODS: Consecutive patients having phacoemulsification and in-the-bag IOL implantation were prospectively studied. Intraocular lens power was calculated by entering 3 combinations of data into the Hoffer Q formula: (1) corneal power measurements by corneal topography (simulated keratometry) and axial length (AL) measurements by Ultrascan ultrasound (US) immersion biometry; (2) Scheimpflug corneal power measurements (simulated keratometry) and US AL measurements; (3) corneal power and AL measurements by partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (IOLMaster). The prediction error was calculated as the difference between the predicted and the measured refraction 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-one eyes were evaluated. The mean arithmetic error was zero for all combinations of measurements due to constant optimization. The mean absolute error (MAE) of the Scheimpflug-US combination was good (0.44 diopters [D] +/- 0.30 [SD]) but significantly higher than the topography-US combination and PCI (0.33 +/- 0.29 D and 0.33 +/- 0.23 D, respectively) (P = .043). The percentage of eyes with an MAE of 0.75 D or greater was higher with the Scheimpflug-US combination (7 eyes, 17%) than with the corneal topography-US combination (2 eyes, 4.8%) or PCI (3 eyes, 7.3%). CONCLUSION: Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system should be used in IOL power calculation formulas with caution because the accuracy is good but is not as high as with standard measurement methods.
机译:目的:评估Pentacam Scheimpflug系统用于人工晶状体(IOL)屈光度计算的角膜屈光度测量的准确性。地点:意大利博洛尼亚Oculistico d'Azeglio工作室。方法:前瞻性研究了连续超声乳化和袋内人工晶体植入的患者。通过将3种数据组合输入Hoffer Q公式来计算人工晶状体屈光力:(1)通过角膜地形图(模拟角膜曲率法)测量角膜屈光力,通过Ultrascan超声(US)浸没式生物测量法测量轴长(AL); (2)Scheimpflug角膜屈光力测量(模拟角膜曲率法)和US AL测量; (3)通过部分相干干涉术(PCI)(IOLMaster)测量角膜屈光力和AL。预测误差计算为术后1个月预测屈光度与测量屈光度之差。结果:评估了41只眼睛。由于不断优化,所有测量组合的平均算术误差为零。 Scheimpflug-US组合的平均绝对误差(MAE)良好(0.44屈光度[D] +/- 0.30 [SD]),但明显高于地形图-US组合和PCI(0.33 +/- 0.29 D和0.33 +分别为0.23 D)(P = .043)。 Scheimpflug-US联合治疗(7眼,17%)的MAE为0.75 D或更高的眼睛百分比高于角膜地形图-US联合治疗(2眼,4.8%)或PCI(3眼,7.3%) )。结论:Pentacam Scheimpflug系统的角膜屈光度测量应在IOL屈光度计算公式中谨慎使用,因为其准确度很高,但不如标准测量方法高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号