...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses.
【24h】

Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses.

机译:切趾衍射人工晶状体的前瞻性视觉评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR+/-0.004 (SD) and 0.019+/-0.020 logMAR, respectively (approximately 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011+/-0.012 logMAR and 0.035+/-0.013 logMAR, respectively (approximately 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P<.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P>.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.
机译:目的:评估多焦点切趾衍射人工晶状体(IOL)植入患者的远,中,近视觉性能。地点:西班牙奥维耶多的费尔南德斯·维加眼科研究所。方法:在325例和335例双侧植入SA60D3 IOL模型的患者中,测量了最佳矫正远视力,最佳远距矫正近视力,中视力,近视和中视条件下的距离对比敏感度以及患者满意度(AcrySof ReSTOR,Alcon)和型号SN60D3 IOL(AcrySof Natural ReSTOR)。结果:术后6个月,ReSTOR IOL和Natural ReSTOR IOL的双眼最佳矫正距离视力分别为0.034 logMAR +/- 0.004(SD)和0.019 +/- 0.020 logMAR(大约20/20)。双眼最佳距离校正近视敏度分别为0.011 +/- 0.012 logMAR和0.035 +/- 0.013 logMAR(大约20/20)。两个IOL模型的中间视敏度均随着测试距离的增加而显着恶化(P <.01)。两种IOL的明暗对比敏感度均在标准正常范围内。在中视条件下,两种IOL的对比敏感度都与单焦点IOL相当,并且比在明视条件下更低,尤其是在较高的空间频率下。在两个IOL模型之间,在视敏度,明视和中视对比敏感度上没有发现统计学上的显着差异(P> .1)。一份患者满意度调查表显示,两个人工晶体在不同光照条件下的距离,中间和近距离活动方面均表现良好,并且满意度可比。结论:AcrySof ReSTOR IOL和AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL在近视和中视条件下在近距离和近距离提供了良好的视觉性能。与远距离和近距离视觉相比,两种模型的中间视觉都降低了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号