首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism: temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions.
【24h】

Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism: temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions.

机译:白内障超声乳化术后眼角膜轻度至中度的手术引起的散光:颞与轴上清晰的角膜切口。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a difference in surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 2 types of clear corneal incisions used in phacoemulsification: the temporal and the on-axis (ie, on the steeper corneal meridian) clear corneal incision (CCTI and CCOI, respectively). SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS: In a prospective randomized controlled trial (pilot study), 61 eyes with cataract and mild to moderate corneal astigmatism (<2.58 diopters [D] on corneal topography) having phacoemulsification (single surgeon, 3.2 mm incision) were randomized to receive CCTI or CCOI. Main outcome measures included postoperative BCVA and corneal astigmatism and SIA (calculated using the Holladay vector analysis formula). Measurements were repeated postoperatively at 3 weeks in all eyes, whereas only 46 eyes made it to the final assessment at 8 weeks. Continuous variables between groups were compared by Student t test. The power of the study was calculated. RESULTS: At the first follow-up, the difference in SIA between the 2 incision types was 0.15 D and it was not statistically significant (0.65 D in CCOI; 0.50 D in CCTI). At the second follow-up, the difference was 0.29 D and it was statistically significant (0.63 D in CCOI; 0.34 D in CCTI; P = .0004). There was no statistically significant difference in the final postoperative visual acuity. The power of the pilot study was 72%. CONCLUSION: Seven weeks after small-incision phacoemulsification, the CCTI induced less SIA than the CCOI; however, there were no significant differences in the final UCVA and BCVA.
机译:目的:确定在超声乳化术中使用的两种类型的透明角膜切口在手术引起的散光(SIA)和术后未矫正视力(UCVA)和最佳矫正视力(BCVA)之间是否存在差异:颞和轴上(即在较陡的角膜子午线上)清除角膜切口(分别为CCTI和CCOI)。地点:英国伦敦Moorfields眼科医院。方法:在一项前瞻性随机对照试验(先导研究)中,将61例白内障和角膜散光轻度至中度(角膜地形图<2.58屈光度[D]),白内障超声乳化术(单手术,3.2 mm切口)随机接受CCTI或CCOI。主要结局指标包括术后BCVA,角膜散光和SIA(使用Holladay矢量分析公式计算)。术后3周对所有眼睛进行重复测量,而8周时只有46只眼进入最终评估。组之间的连续变量通过学生t检验进行比较。计算了研究的功效。结果:在第一次随访中,两种切口类型之间的SIA差异为0.15 D,但无统计学意义(CCOI为0.65 D; CCTI为0.50 D)。在第二次随访中,差异为0.29 D,且具有统计学意义(CCOI为0.63 D; CCTI为0.34 D; P = .0004)。最终术后视力无统计学差异。初步研究的功效为72%。结论:小切口超声乳化术后7周,CCTI引起的SIA比CCOI少。但是,最终的UCVA和BCVA没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号