Corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in keratoconic versus post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate and compare corneal biomechanical waveform parameters between keratoconic and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting: Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. Design: Comparative case series. Methods: The Ocular Response Analyzer was used to obtain the corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and 39 biomechanical waveform parameters in manifest keratoconic eyes and post-femtosecond LASIK eyes. Univariate tests were used to assess the difference in each parameter between the 2 groups of eyes. After controlling for central corneal thickness (CCT) and age, a logistic regression model was used to select the parameters most useful in distinguishing between the 2 groups. Results: After statistically controlling for the differences in CCT and age, 7 parameters were found to be the most useful in distinguishing between groups: aplhf (high frequency noise in the region between peaks [P1 and P2]; P<.0001), w2 (width of P2 at base; P=.001), dslop1 (down-slope of P1 of wave; P<.0001), aindex (degree of "non-monotonicity" of rising and falling edges of first peak of wave, P=.0007), uslope1 (upslope of the P1 of wave; P=.001), CH (P=.035), and P1area (area under P1 of wave; P=.006). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model using these parameters was 0.932. Conclusions: Differences in multiple biomechanical waveform parameters between the keratoconus and post-LASIK groups suggests that waveform analysis may be useful to differentiate between healthy and diseased biomechanical conditions. Financial Disclosure: Dr. Hamilton has received honoraria from Reichert for educational lectures on corneal biomechanics. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.