...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Pain in scleral pocket incision cataract surgery using topical and peribulbar anesthesia (see comments)
【24h】

Pain in scleral pocket incision cataract surgery using topical and peribulbar anesthesia (see comments)

机译:使用局部麻醉和球周麻醉在巩膜袋切口白内障手术中疼痛(请参阅评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pain produced during different phases of phacoemulsification cataract surgery using a scleral pocket incision under topical versus peribulbar anesthesia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 100 cataract patients who were randomly selected to have phacoemulsification with a scleral pocket incision using either topical or peribulbar anesthesia. Topical anesthesia comprised oxybuprocaine 0.4% drops. Peribulbar anesthesia was given with an inferolateral transconjuctival injection of an even mixture of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with hyaluronidase. Inadvertent eye movement during surgery was recorded. Pain occurring during intravenous line cannulation, introduction of the anesthetic agent, and phacoemulsification was measured using a visual analog scale (from 0 to 10) and a descriptive verbal 5-step scale. Patients were asked about pain immediately after each phase. RESULTS: The pain during cannulation was similar in both groups (P = .498). The peribulbar injection was statistically significantly more painful than induction of topical anesthesia (2.11 and 0.10, respectively; P < .001). Surgery was statistically significantly more painful in the topical group than in the peribulbar group (2.76 and 0.85, respectively; P < .001). The mean pain score during all 3 phases was similar (1.43 topical group and 1.51 peribulbar group; P = .500). On the verbal scale, surgery was more painful under topical than under peribulbar anesthesia (P < .001). There were no statistical differences in pain during the peribulbar injection and during cannulation (P = .461 and P = .462, respectively). Inadvertent eye movement occurred more often in the topical anesthesia group. CONCLUSION: Considering the entire procedure, total pain using topical anesthesia was acceptable and equal to that using peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification with a scleral pocket incision. Pain during phacoemulsification was greater under topical anesthesia but not significantly different from the pain during the peribulbar injection.
机译:目的:评估在局部麻醉与眼球周围麻醉下使用巩膜袋切口在超声乳化白内障手术不同阶段产生的疼痛。地点:芬兰奥卢,奥卢大学医院眼科。方法:这项前瞻性研究包括100名白内障患者,这些患者被随机选择采用局部或球周麻醉在巩膜袋切口处进行超声乳化术。局部麻醉包括0.4%的奥昔洛因滴剂。球下麻醉是通过结膜下外侧结膜下注射2%利多卡因和0.5%布比卡因与透明质酸酶的均匀混合物进行的。记录了手术期间眼睛的无意移动。使用视觉模拟量表(从0到10)和描述性口头5步量表测量在静脉输液管插管,麻醉药的引入和超声乳化术期间发生的疼痛。每个阶段后立即询问患者有关疼痛的信息。结果:两组的插管过程中疼痛相似(P = .498)。统计学上,球周注射比局部麻醉诱导的疼痛明显得多(分别为2.11和0.10; P <.001)。从统计学上来说,局部治疗组的手术痛苦比眼球周围组明显(分别为2.76和0.85; P <0.001)。在所有三个阶段中的平均疼痛评分相似(1.43局部组和1.51球周组; P = .500)。在言语上,局部麻醉下的手术比眼睑周围麻醉下的痛苦更大(P <.001)。在球周注射期间和插管期间,疼痛没有统计学差异(分别为P = 0.461和P = 0.462)。在局部麻醉组中,无意的眼球运动发生率更高。结论:考虑到整个过程,局部麻醉的总疼痛是可以接受的,与使用巩膜袋切口进行超声乳化白内障麻醉的总疼痛相同。在局部麻醉下,超声乳化术中的疼痛更大,但与球周注药过程中的疼痛没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号