首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Comparison of energy required for phaco-chop and divide and conquer phacoemulsification.
【24h】

Comparison of energy required for phaco-chop and divide and conquer phacoemulsification.

机译:晶状体切碎和分割并征服超声乳化所需能量的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and usefulness of phaco-chop cataract extraction. SETTING: A university-associated, multispecialty ophthalmology practice. METHODS: Fifty-three patients in a university-associated ophthalmology practice had cataract extraction, 32 by the phaco-chop technique and 21 by four-quadrant divide and conquer phacoemulsification. Phacoemulsification energy and complication rates were compared. RESULTS: Mean phacoemulsification energy was significantly lower in the phaco-chop group (mean 782 J +/- 446 [SD]) than in the divide and conquer group (mean 3264 +/- 1218 J)(P < .00001). No complications occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: The phaco-chop technique provided safe, effective cataract extraction with significantly less energy than that required for divide and conquer phacoemulsification.
机译:目的:评估超声乳化白内障摘除术的安全性和有效性。地点:大学相关的多专业眼科诊所。方法:在与大学有关的眼科实践中,有53例患者进行了白内障摘除,32例通过超声切碎术,21例通过四象限分割和征服超声乳化术。比较超声乳化能量和并发症发生率。结果:超声乳化术组的平均超声乳化能量(平均782 J +/- 446 [SD])显着低于分治组(平均3264 +/- 1218 J)(P <.00001)。两组均无并发症发生。结论:超声乳化术技术提供了安全,有效的白内障摘除术,其能量明显少于分液和征服超声乳化术所需的能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号