...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system.
【24h】

Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system.

机译:使用光具座系统客观评估老花眼矫正的人工晶状体的全焦点光学性能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: TO evaluate spherical aberration and through-focus optical performances of 5 presbyopia-correcting and 2 monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). SETTING: Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: Five presbyopia-correcting IOLs (Restor +4D SN6AD3, Restor +3D SN6AD1, Rezoom NXG1, Tecnis multifocal ZM900, Crystalens HD500) were tested using an optical bench system consisting of a model eye, a high-resolution Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor, and an image-capturing device. Two monofocal IOLs (Sofport AO LI60AOV, Acrysof SN60AT) were measured for comparison. No accommodation was simulated. The spherical aberration profiles of each IOL were measured using the wavefront sensor. Through-focus performance was evaluated by calculating cross-correlation coefficients and comparing the likenesses of captured images of a resolution target and a perfect reference image. RESULTS: With a 5.0 mm entrance pupil, the SN6AD3, SN6AD1, ZM900, NXG1, and HD500 IOLs had spherical aberration of -0.18 mum, -0.14 mum, -0.15 mum, -0.07 mum, and -0.01 mum, respectively. Distance image quality was poorer with multifocal and accommodating IOLs than with monofocal IOLs. All multifocal IOLs had effective distance and near image quality but had a loss in intermediate image quality. The HD 500 accommodating IOL had decreased distance image quality and slightly increased depth of focus compared with the monofocal IOLs because of the bispheric design. CONCLUSIONS: The presbyopia-correcting IOLs had different optical characteristics, including spherical aberration profile and through-focus performance. An accurate understanding of the optical characteristics of individual IOLs is essential to selecting the best presbyopia-correcting IOL and thus improving cataract surgery outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的:评估5个老花眼矫正眼镜和2个单​​焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的球差和全焦点光学性能。地点:美国纽约罗彻斯特罗彻斯特大学弗劳姆眼科研究所。设计:实验研究。方法:使用由模型眼,高分辨率Hartmann-Shack波前传感器组成的光具座系统测试了五个老花眼矫正IOL(Restor + 4D SN6AD3,Restore + 3D SN6AD1,Rezoom NXG1,Tecnis多焦点ZM900,Crystalens HD500)。 ,以及图像捕获设备。测量了两个单焦点IOL(Sofport AO LI60AOV,Acrysof SN60AT)以进行比较。没有模拟住宿。使用波前传感器测量每个IOL的球面像差曲线。通过计算互相关系数并比较分辨率目标的捕获图像和完美参考图像的相似度,可以评估全焦点性能。结果:SN6AD3,SN6AD1,ZM900,NXG1和HD500 IOL的入射光瞳为5.0 mm,其球差分别为-0.18微米,-0.14微米,-0.15微米,-0.07微米和-0.01微米。与单焦点IOL相比,多焦点和可容纳IOL的远距图像质量较差。所有多焦点IOL均具有有效的距离和接近的图像质量,但中间图像质量有所损失。与双焦点IOL相比,可容纳HD 500的IOL与单焦点IOL相比,距离图像质量下降,焦深略微增加。结论:矫正老花眼的人工晶体具有不同的光学特性,包括球差像差和透焦性能。准确了解单个IOL的光学特性对于选择最佳的老花眼矫正IOL,从而改善白内障手术效果至关重要。财务披露:没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或所有权利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号