首页> 外文期刊>Clinical breast cancer >Sunitinib plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label trial.
【24h】

Sunitinib plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label trial.

机译:舒尼替尼联合紫杉醇与贝伐单抗联合紫杉醇用于晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗:III期随机开放性试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: A multicenter, open-label phase III study was conducted to test whether sunitinib plus paclitaxel prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2(-) advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER2(-) advanced breast cancer who were disease free for >/= 12 months after adjuvant taxane treatment were randomized (1:1; planned enrollment 740 patients) to receive intravenous (I.V.) paclitaxel 90 mg/m(2) every week for 3 weeks in 4-week cycles plus either sunitinib 25 to 37.5 mg every day or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg I.V. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early because of futility in reaching the primary endpoint as determined by the independent data monitoring committee during an interim futility analysis. At data cutoff, 242 patients had been randomized to sunitinib-paclitaxel and 243 patients to bevacizumab-paclitaxel. Median PFS was shorter with sunitinib-paclitaxel (7.4 vs. 9.2 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-2.25]; 1-sided P = .999). At a median follow-up of 8.1 months, with 79% of sunitinib-paclitaxel and 87% of bevacizumab-paclitaxel patients alive, overall survival analysis favored bevacizumab-paclitaxel (HR 1.82 [95% CI, 1.16-2.86]; 1-sided P = .996). The objective response rate was 32% in both arms, but median duration of response was shorter with sunitinib-paclitaxel (6.3 vs. 14.8 months). Bevacizumab-paclitaxel was better tolerated than sunitinib-paclitaxel. This was primarily due to a high frequency of grade 3/4, treatment-related neutropenia with sunitinib-paclitaxel (52%) precluding delivery of the prescribed doses of both drugs. CONCLUSION: The sunitinib-paclitaxel regimen evaluated in this study was clinically inferior to the bevacizumab-paclitaxel regimen and is not a recommended treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer.
机译:简介:进行了一项多中心,开放标签的III期研究,以测试舒尼替尼联合紫杉醇与贝伐单抗联合紫杉醇作为HER2(-)晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗是否能延长无进展生存期(PFS)。患者和方法:将在紫杉烷辅助治疗后≥/ = 12个月无疾病的HER2(-)晚期乳腺癌患者随机分组(1:1;计划纳入740例患者),接受静脉注射(IV)紫杉醇90 mg / m (2)每周3周(共4周),外加每天25至37.5 mg舒尼替尼或贝伐单抗10 mg / kg静脉注射结果:该试验因独立数据监测委员会在临时无效性分析期间确定的达到主要终点的无效性而提前终止。截止数据时,有242例患者被随机分配至舒尼替尼-紫杉醇,而243例患者被随机分配至贝伐单抗-紫杉醇。舒尼替尼-紫杉醇的中位PFS较短(7.4 vs. 9.2个月;危险比[HR] 1.63 [95%置信区间(CI),1.18-2.25];单侧P = .999)。中位随访期为8.1个月,舒尼替尼-紫杉醇组为79%,贝伐单抗-紫杉醇组为87%,总生存期分析偏爱贝伐单抗-紫杉醇(HR 1.82 [95%CI,1.16-2.86];单侧P = .996)。两组的客观缓解率均为32%,但舒尼替尼-紫杉醇的缓解中位时间较短(6.3 vs. 14.8个月)。贝伐单抗-紫杉醇比舒尼替尼-紫杉醇耐受性更好。这主要是由于3/4级舒尼替尼-紫杉醇(52%)引起的与治疗相关的中性粒细胞减少症的频率较高,因此无法按规定剂量两种药物给药。结论:本研究评估的舒尼替尼-紫杉醇方案在临床上不如贝伐单抗-紫杉醇方案,对于晚期乳腺癌患者,不推荐使用该方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号