...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical periodontology >Subgingival debridement of periodontal pockets by air polishing in comparison with ultrasonic instrumentation during maintenance therapy.
【24h】

Subgingival debridement of periodontal pockets by air polishing in comparison with ultrasonic instrumentation during maintenance therapy.

机译:与维持治疗期间的超声仪器相比,通过空气抛光对牙周袋进行龈下清创术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AIM: The objective was to determine clinical and microbiological effects and perceived treatment discomfort of root debridement by subgingival air polishing compared with ultrasonic instrumentation during supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial was conducted as a split-mouth designed study of 2-month duration including 20 recall patients previously treated for chronic periodontitis. Sites with probing pocket depth (PPD) of 5-8 mm and bleeding on probing (BoP+) in two quadrants were randomly assigned to subgingival debridement by (i) glycine powder/air polishing applied with a specially designed nozzle or (ii) ultrasonic instrumentation. Clinical variables were recorded at baseline, 14 and 60 days post-treatment. Primary clinical efficacy variable was PPD reduction. Microbiological analysis of subgingival samples was performed immediately before and after debridement, 2 and 14 days post-treatment. RESULTS: Both treatment procedures resulted in significant reductions of periodontitis-associated bacterial species immediately and 2 days after treatment, and in significant reduction in BoP, PPD and relative attachment level at 2 months. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment procedures at any of the examinations intervals. Perceived treatment discomfort was lower for air polishing than ultrasonic debridement. CONCLUSION: This short-term study revealed no pertinent differences in clinical or microbiological outcomes between subgingival air polishing and ultrasonic debridement of moderate deep pockets in SPT patients.
机译:目的:确定在支持性牙周治疗(SPT)期间与超声仪相比,通过龈下空气抛光对根清除创的临床和微生物学影响以及感觉到的治疗不适感。材料与方法:该试验是一项为期2个月的分口设计研究,包括20名先前接受过慢性牙周炎治疗的召回患者。在两个象限中探测口袋深度(PPD)为5-8 mm且探测出血(BoP +)的部位通过(i)甘氨酸粉/空气抛光和特殊设计的喷嘴或(ii)超声仪器随机分配到龈下清创术。在治疗后的第14天和第60天记录临床变量。主要临床疗效变量为PPD降低。在清创前后,治疗后2和14天立即进行龈下样品的微生物学分析。结果:两种治疗方法均导致治疗后立即和治疗后2天牙周炎相关细菌的数量显着减少,以及2个月时BoP,PPD和相对附着水平的显着降低。在任何检查间隔下,治疗程序之间均无统计学上的显着差异。空气抛光的感觉不适比超声清创术低。结论:这项短期研究显示,在SPT患者中,龈下空气抛光与中度深囊的超声清创术在临床或微生物学结局方面无相关差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号