首页> 外文期刊>Clinical biomechanics >Back strength cannot be predicted accurately from anthropometric measures in subjects with and without chronic low back pain.
【24h】

Back strength cannot be predicted accurately from anthropometric measures in subjects with and without chronic low back pain.

机译:根据人体测量法无法准确预测有或没有慢性下腰痛的受试者的背部力量。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives. (1) To develop a multiple regression equation using anthropometric measurements to predict back strength and (2) to estimate the effect of practice on the back strength results and back strength predictions.Design. Comparative study with repeated measures performed on three days.Background. The assessment of back muscle relative endurance (% maximal strength) requires the measurement of maximal back strength which is problematic with low back pain patients.Methods. The back strength (L5/S1 static extension moment), age and 26 anthropometric parameters were obtained from 83 male volunteers [42 healthy subjects and 41 chronic low back pain patients] aged between 20 and 60 years. A subsample of 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients were assessed through three days of testing to evaluate the variations of back strength with practice.Results. The final regression model (n=42 healthy subjects) explained 39% of the variance in back strength. Back strength increased with practice (Day1
机译:目标。 (1)使用人体测量学开发多元回归方程来预测背肌强度,(2)评估练习对背肌强度结果和背肌强度预测的影响。在三天的重复措施下进行比较研究。评估背部肌肉的相对耐力(最大力量百分比)需要测量最大背部力量,这对于下背痛患者是有问题的。从83位年龄在20至60岁之间的男性志愿者(42位健康受试者和41位慢性下腰痛患者)获得了背部力量(L5 / S1静态伸展力矩),年龄和26项人体测量学参数。通过三天的测试评估了20名健康受试者和20名患者的子样本,以评估背部力量随练习的变化。最终的回归模型(n = 42名健康受试者)解释了39%的背部力量差异。健康和患者组的背部力量均随着练习(第1天<第2天和第3天)的增加而增加。然而,从回归模型得出的预测背部力量的误差仅在实践中显示出对患者的显着改善。没有简单的人体测量方法就无法预测背部力量,而没有重大错误。患者组获得的预测误差的减少表明与运动学习无关的心理因素的影响在减小,因为运动学习的影响将同时出现在两组(如果存在)。可用于确定(1)特定运动的相对力量水平或(2)损伤前的背部力量。不幸的是,人体测量值还不足以预测背部力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号