...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.
【24h】

Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer.

机译:姑息化疗会姑息吗?评估接受晚期卵巢癌化疗的女性的期望,结果和成本。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can
机译:目的:难治性卵巢癌和复发性卵巢癌妇女的姑息性化疗的价值难以量化,对这些疗法对患者的期望知之甚少。在当前的前瞻性研究中,我们评估了接受二线或三线化疗的复发性或难治性晚期卵巢癌患者的期望,化疗的姑息性结局以及固有的资源利用。方法:使用欧洲癌症生活质量研究和治疗组织C30(EORTC QLQ C30)和卵巢癌治疗功能评估(FACT-O)问卷评估姑息治疗获益,并使用内部问卷调查用于评估患者的期望值。通过要求女性对变化进行总体评估并将其与EORTC QLQ C30相关联,可以计算出最小的临床重要差异(MCID)。记录资源使用情况并计算成本。结果:27例患者入选。在27人中有7人记录了客观反应。中位生存期为11个月。 65%的女性期望化学疗法可以使她们寿命更长,而42%的女性希望可以治愈她们。经过两个周期后,尤其是EORTC QLQ C-30的整体功能(21分中的11分)和情绪功能(21分中的13分),生活质量(QL)得到改善。在这些类别中,改善分别持续了2个月和3个月。计算得出的MCID在七点量表上的物理功能为0.39,全局功能的0.13。研究期间每位患者的平均总费用为Can

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号