...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy.
【24h】

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamide cancer therapy.

机译:大剂量环磷酰胺治疗后粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子和粒细胞集落刺激因子的比较作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: We compared hematologic and clinical effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX, 7 g/m2), given as the first phase of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy program that includes a myeloablative therapy with mobilized progenitor cell autografting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, or poor-prognosis breast cancer received GM-CSF (n = 27) or G-CSF (n = 22) after HD-CTX in two consecutive, nonrandomized studies. Cytokines were administered in continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 14 to 15 days at a median dose of 5.5 and 10 micrograms/kg/d, respectively, starting 24 hours after HD-CTX. RESULTS: Neutrophil recovery was faster with G-CSF administration (11.5 v 13.2 days; P = .01), whereas platelet counts recovered more rapidly with GM-CSF (13.7 v 16.6 days; P = .01). Prophylactic platelet transfusions were administered more frequently to patients treated with G-CSF than with GM-CSF (66% v 22% of the patients; P = .02). No clinically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning days of absolute neutropenia or neutropenic fever. Both cytokines reduced the time to eligibility for subsequent chemotherapy administration compared with historical controls not given cytokine (14 to 16 v 20 days). Both cytokines increased circulation of hematopoietic progenitors. Most side effects were World Health Organization (WHO) median grade 1 to 2, were more frequent during GM-CSF than during G-CSF treatment, and were reversible by simple supportive measures and/or by dose reduction or suspension of the cytokine. Permanent suspension of cytokine administration was never required in either group. CONCLUSION: GM-CSF or G-CSF administration after HD-CTX reduces hematologic toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy and induces circulation of large amounts of hematopoietic progenitors suitable for autografting in cancer patients.
机译:目的:我们比较了大剂量环磷酰胺(HD-CTX,7 g / m2)治疗后的粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)和粒细胞-集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的血液学和临床效果,作为高剂量顺序化疗计划的第一阶段,该计划包括采用自体动员祖细胞移植的清髓疗法。患者与方法:连续四十九例非霍奇金淋巴瘤,霍奇金病或预后不良的乳腺癌患者在连续两次接受HD-CTX后接受GM-CSF(n = 27)或G-CSF(n = 22),非随机研究。 HD-CTX后24小时开始,分别以5.5和10微克/ kg / d的中位剂量连续14到15天连续静脉(i.v.)输注给予细胞因子。结果:G-CSF给药后中性粒细胞恢复更快(11.5 v 13.2天; P = 0.01),而GM-CSF血小板计数恢复得更快(13.7 v 16.6天; P = 0.01)。与GM-CSF相比,接受G-CSF的患者预防性输注血小板的频率更高(66%对22%的患者; P = .02)。两组之间在绝对嗜中性白血球减少症或嗜中性白血球减少的天数方面没有观察到临床上的显着差异。与未给予细胞因子的历史对照(14至16 v 20天)相比,两种细胞因子均减少了进行后续化疗的时间。两种细胞因子均增加了造血祖细胞的循环。大多数副作用是世界卫生组织(WHO)的1至2级中位数,在GM-CSF期间比在G-CSF治疗期间更频繁,并且通过简单的支持措施和/或剂量降低或细胞因子悬浮可逆。两组均不需要永久停止细胞因子的给药。结论:HD-CTX后给予GM-CSF或G-CSF可降低大剂量化疗的血液学毒性,并诱导大量适用于癌症患者自体移植的造血祖细胞循环。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号