首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.
【24h】

Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

机译:一项随机,多中心,对照试验,比较了每3周服用或不服用静脉铁剂的darbepoetinα在化疗引起的贫血患者中的疗效和安全性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The concomitant use of intravenous (IV) iron as a supplement to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha given with IV iron versus with local standard practice (oral iron or no iron). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study, 396 patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and hemoglobin (Hb) less than 11 g/dL received darbepoetin alpha 500 microg with (n = 200) or without (n = 196) IV iron once every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 16 weeks. RESULTS: The hematopoietic response rate (proportion of patients achieving Hb >or= 12 g/dL or Hb increase of >or= 2 g/dL from baseline) was significantly higher in the IV iron group: 86% versus 73% in the standard practice group (difference of 13% [95% CI, 3% to 23%]; P = .011). Fewer RBC transfusions (week 5 to the end of the treatment period) occurred in the IV iron group: 9% versus 20% in the standard practice group (difference of -11% [95% CI, -18% to -3%]; P = .005). Both treatments were well tolerated with no notable differences in adverse events. Serious adverse events related to iron occurred in 3% of patients in the IV iron group and were mostly gastrointestinal in nature. CONCLUSION: Addition of IV iron to darbepoetin alpha Q3W in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia was well tolerated, resulting in an improved hematopoietic response rate and lower incidence of transfusions compared with darbepoetin alpha alone.
机译:目的:在化疗引起的贫血患者中,同时使用静脉注射铁作为促红细胞生成剂的补充剂是有争议的。本研究旨在评估静脉注射铁剂与当地标准疗法(口服铁剂或不使用铁剂)一起给予达比泊汀α的疗效和安全性。患者与方法:在这项多中心,随机,开放标签的III期研究中,对396例非骨髓性恶性肿瘤和血红蛋白(Hb)低于11 g / dL的患者接受了达贝泊汀α500微克治疗,其中(n = 200)或不使用(n = 196)每3周(Q3W)一次进行IV熨烫,持续16周。结果:静脉铁剂组的造血反应率(Hb>或= 12 g / dL或Hb从基线增加>或= 2 g / dL的患者比例)显着更高:标准组为86%,而标准组为73%练习组(差异为13%[95%CI,3%至23%]; P = .011)。静脉铁剂组发生的RBC输血次数较少(治疗期的第5周到结束):9%vs标准练习组的20%(差异为-11%[95%CI,-18%至-3%] ; P = .005)。两种治疗均耐受良好,不良事件无明显差异。静脉铁剂组中有3%的患者发生了与铁有关的严重不良事件,并且本质上大多是胃肠道疾病。结论:与单独的达比泊汀α相比,化疗引起的贫血患者在达比泊汀αQ3W中添加IV铁具有良好的耐受性,从而改善了造血反应率,降低了输血发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号