首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Comparison of cladribine plus cyclophosphamide with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase III randomized study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG-CLL3 Study).
【24h】

Comparison of cladribine plus cyclophosphamide with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase III randomized study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG-CLL3 Study).

机译:克拉屈滨联合环磷酰胺与氟达拉滨联合环磷酰胺作为慢性淋巴细胞白血病的一线治疗的比较:波兰成人白血病小组进行的一项III期随机研究(PALG-CLL3研究)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE Little is known about comparison of the activity of different purine nucleoside analogs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We conducted a randomized phase III trial to compare efficacy and safety of cladribine and fludarabine, each combined with cyclophosphamide, in previously untreated progressive CLL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received cladribine at 0.12 mg/kg combined with cyclophosphamide at 250 mg/m(2) for 3 days intravenously (CC regimen) or fludarabine at 25 mg/m(2) combined with cyclophosphamide at 250 mg/m(2) for 3 days intravenously (FC regimen), every 28 days for up to six cycles. The primary end point was complete response (CR) rate. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS Of 423 randomly assigned patients (211 to CC and 212 to FC), 395 were evaluated in the final analysis. The CR and ORR reached 47% and 88% in the CC arm and 46% and 82% in the FC arm (P = .25 and P = .11, respectively). The median PFS was 2.34 years with CC and 2.27 years with FC (P = .51). OS and grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicity were also comparable. Moreover, we did not observe any significant differences in CC and FC efficacy across different patient prognostic subgroups that included patients with 17p13 (TP53 gene) deletion who had poor survival in both study arms. CONCLUSION Cladribine and fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide are equally effective and safe first-line regimens for progressive CLL. Both combinations have unsatisfactory activity in patients with 17p13 (TP53 gene) deletion.
机译:目的关于比较不同嘌呤核苷类似物在慢性淋巴细胞性白血病(CLL)中的活性知之甚少。我们进行了一项随机III期试验,以比较克拉屈滨和氟达拉滨(分别与环磷酰胺联合使用)在以前未经治疗的进行性CLL中的疗效和安全性。患者和方法患者接受静脉注射(CC方案)0.12 mg / kg克拉屈滨联合250 mg / m(2)环磷酰胺3天(CC方案)或25 mg / m(2)氟达拉滨联合250 mg / m(2)环磷酰胺)静脉注射3天(FC方案),每28天进行一次,最多六个周期。主要终点是完全缓解率。次要终点包括总体缓解率(ORR),无进展生存期(PFS),总体生存期(OS)和与治疗相关的毒性。结果在423位随机分配的患者中(211位为CC,212位为FC),在最终分析中评估了395位。 CC组的CR和ORR分别达到47%和88%,FC组分别达到46%和82%(分别为P = .25和P = .11)。 CC的中位PFS为2.34年,FC的中位PFS为2.27年(P = .51)。 OS和3/4级与治疗相关的毒性也具有可比性。此外,我们没有观察到不同患者预后亚组在CC和FC疗效上的任何显着差异,这些亚组包括在两个研究组中均存活率较低的17p13(TP53基因)缺失的患者。结论克拉屈滨和氟达拉滨联合环磷酰胺是进行性CLL的同样有效和安全的一线治疗方案。两种组合在17p13(TP53基因)缺失患者中的活性均不能令人满意。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号